Hi Gianfranco
On 17.08.2015 at 16:41 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> 1)
>
> # upstream does not sign releases
> #yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
That is a commented out leftover. I have removed it anyway so other
won't think it is still used like you ;-)
> 2) sbin/yadifad/ins
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Markus,
Following my review:
1)
# upstream does not sign releases
#yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
ls upstream/signing-key.asc
upstream/signing-key.asc
which one is correct?
2) sbin/yadifad/install-sh
not mentioned in copyright
(and every insta
Hi everyone,
On 16.08.2015 at 22:53 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Christian Kastner , 2015-08-16, 19:08:
>> debian/rules:
>> - I believe the "export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work" can be
>> dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find
>> any reference to this in recent docu
* Christian Kastner , 2015-08-16, 19:08:
debian/rules:
- I believe the "export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work" can be
dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find
any reference to this in recent documentation. dh(1), for example,
makes no mention of this. Second
Hi Markus,
On 2015-06-05 13:52, Markus Schade wrote:
> New package for yadifa 2.1.0 is available
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yadifa/yadifa_2.1.0-1.dsc
>
> It would be great if someone could sponsor this package. I think
> the history of this bugreport proves that the package
On 03/05/2015 04:32 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:24 +0100, Markus Schade wrote:
>> And I have asked them to do so, of course. Likewise with the other
>> things you mentioned (e.g. signing their releases).
>
> Ah, good. I wasn't sure if you had done that, sorry.
>
>> My point is
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:24 +0100, Markus Schade wrote:
> Yes, I know that. ;-)
> And I have asked them to do so, of course. Likewise with the other
> things you mentioned (e.g. signing their releases).
Ah, good. I wasn't sure if you had done that, sorry.
> My point is that I cannot make upstrea
On 03/05/2015 04:16 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Markus Schade wrote:
> You could forward the code quality issues upstream as suggested by the
> Debian social contract:
>
> https://www.debian.org/social_contract
Yes, I know that. ;-)
And I have asked them to do so, of c
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Markus Schade wrote:
> But then again, I am just the packager not the developer. So I can do
> little about the code quality.
You could forward the code quality issues upstream as suggested by the
Debian social contract:
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
--
Dear Paul, dear mentors,
Thank you for your extensive review. I won't go into detail for every
item you have mentioned, but I believe that many if not most issues have
been dealt with.
But then again, I am just the packager not the developer. So I can do
little about the code quality.
All of my
10 matches
Mail list logo
