Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-25 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34) Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by installing the binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know there's an important difference in ld.gold related to --as-needed (or possibly to - --no-as-needed, I don't recall

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-25 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Ahmed, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:52:43) At the end of the README it says to use mountlo, but there isn't such a utility in Debian. there is also no such utility in other distributions it seems. After some digging I found out that mountlo is a utility which uses fuse and a minimal

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-25 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/25/2014 05:24 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34) Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by installing the binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know there's an important

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-22 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Ahmed, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02) Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email. thanks! What problem does that patch fix? The only differences in comparison to my patch that I can make out are: 1) you add -lpthread but `pkg-config --libs

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-22 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:22:12AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi Ahmed, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02) Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email. thanks! What problem does that patch fix? The only differences in comparison to my patch

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-22 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11) Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@ which causes the compilation to fail, because the -l... should be after the object files (or source files in this case). Ah funny,

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-22 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/22/2014 05:12 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11) Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@ which causes the compilation to fail,

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-21 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Hello, * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified patch is attached. * I think it would be useful to install upstream's README.md (just add it in debian/fuseloop.docs) * The README isn't clear about how to actually mount the exposed partition --

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-21 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Ahmed, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13) * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified patch is attached. I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after informing upstream of the issue, they fixed it for fuseloop 1.0.2 which is

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-21 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi Ahmed, Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13) * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified patch is attached. I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after informing

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-21 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: It is clear for me. Maybe if you tell me how it is not clear for you I can fix it accordingly. I especially like how the README even includes steps to use fdisk to figure out the partition offsets. ---end quoted text--- At the

Bug#735182: RFS: fuseloop/1.0.1-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE

2014-01-13 Thread Johannes Schauer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fuseloop * Package name: fuseloop Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Johny Mattsson * URL : https://github.com/jmattsson/fuseloop * License : BSD