Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-26 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:34:22PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Aye, lilyterm-data is only 76K. Even when multiplied by 12 architectures, that's still less than a megabyte. And now for something completely different: You must not remove the alternative in prerm upgrade. See bug #71621 for

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.06.2014 16:41, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm Package name: lilyterm Version : 0.9.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet) URL :

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
[I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!] * Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru, 2014-06-25, 16:27: lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X Typo: eazy - easy why did you create lilyterm-data? Can't you just swallow it by main lilyterm package? You may need extra

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:27:51PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: Besides, why did you create lilyterm-data? Can't you just swallow it by main lilyterm package? You may need extra -data in two cases -- when that -data comes from a separate source, or when you have several different variations

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
At Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:27:51 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: You may need extra -data in two cases -- when that -data comes from a separate source, or when you have several different variations of your term package (say, gtk2 and gtk3 versions) which all use a common set of data files.

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru, 2014-06-25, 16:27: lilyterm - Light and eazy-to-use terminal emulator for X Typo: eazy - easy Thank for the review, just uploading a new one. The third case (likely most common one) is when

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Yavor Doganov
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: The third case (likely most common one) is when an arch:any package would otherwise contain huge /usr/share. Which doesn't seem to be the case here either. Actually this is the reason for

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org, 2014-06-25, 19:02: Lintian issues a warning if the data in /usr/share is more than 4 MB or more than 2 MB *and* more than 50% of the package. It is not the case for your package so splitting it does more harm than good, IMO. Aye, lilyterm-data is only 76K. Even

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-24 Thread 陳昌倬
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm Package name: lilyterm Version : 0.9.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet) URL : http://lilyterm.luna.com.tw/ License : GPL-3+

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-24 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 06/24/2014 09:41 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm i'm a lilyterm user, i offer my help to co-maintain the package -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333