Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 pending I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned dependency? See lintian info tag: I: libperformance0.5: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libPerformance.so.0.5.0 N: N:

Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library

2014-07-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Paul Gevers wrote: I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned dependency? Symbols files are ultimately unapplicable for Objective-C libraries (see #749202). Using them can be very harmful -- lax

Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Gevers
On 15-07-14 18:46, Yavor Doganov wrote: Paul Gevers wrote: I uploaded the package, but may I request that next time you add a symbols file so that depending packages get a properly versioned dependency? Symbols files are ultimately unapplicable for Objective-C libraries (see #749202).

Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library

2014-07-15 Thread Yavor Doganov
Paul Gevers wrote: Let's just agree that it helps me in helping you getting your packages updated in Debian if you document that you thought about the lintian warnings (by overriding them with a good comment attached). I see; there's no problem at all for me to do that. It would require

Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library

2014-06-30 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-performance. * Package name: gnustep-performance Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Richard Frith-Macdonald r...@gnu.org * URL : http://gnustep.org