Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-15 Thread Thomas Calderon
On 12/12/2014 17:53, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit : >> 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will >> now use "upstream" and "debian" branches instead. Therefore, release >> tarballs will not contain this directory. > > $ tar tf

Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit : > 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will > now use "upstream" and "debian" branches instead. Therefore, release > tarballs will not contain this directory. $ tar tf ../caml-crush_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz|grep debian caml-crus

Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-11 Thread Thomas Calderon
On 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon wrote: > On 24/11/2014 18:01, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit : >>> I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the >>> packaging of Caml Crush. >>> [...] >> >> First remarks: >> >> 1. There is a "de

Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-02 Thread Thomas Calderon
On 24/11/2014 18:01, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit : >> I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the >> packaging of Caml Crush. >> [...] > > First remarks: > > 1. There is a "debian" directory in the upstream tarball, is that >

Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-11-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit : > I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the > packaging of Caml Crush. > [...] First remarks: 1. There is a "debian" directory in the upstream tarball, is that intentional? Keep in mind that is is ignored in favour of