Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org, 2015-06-24, 10:16: Also I believe the correct name of the license is GPL-2 instead of GPL-2.0. FWIW, both names are correct: For SPDX compatibility, versions with trailing dot-zeroes are considered to be equivalent to versions without (e.g., 2.0.0 is

Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi Dmitry, thanks for checking this over! Yes, all right I've installed an override for dh_auto_test. However the test suite doesn't seem to be complete and breaks on some missing things. I've contacted upstream if it's supposed to run somehow. GPL short name changed. I've wondered myself

Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hello, I'm seeking for an uploader resp. sponsor of my package of pylint-celery [1]. It's a requirement for Prospector [2]. I've pushed the package to a new Git repo of the DPMT:

Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-23 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Daniel, On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:20:34 Daniel Stender wrote: I'm seeking for an uploader resp. sponsor of my package of pylint-celery I'm not sure if I'll be able to sponsor your package but I had a quick look and spotted a problem in packaging: it is incorrect to override DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS