Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-05-23 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Monday, 23 May 2016 9:08:20 AM AEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months? Not much from packaging prospective. Upstream however show some signs of improvement as they've started using GitHub: https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs > Dmitry setted the

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-05-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: > > Obvious way to improve packaging would be to address Lintian warnings, > > introduce support for Systemd etc. Sorry I don't have time for in-depth > > review and at the moment I have no intention to sponsor MooseFS...

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-18 Thread Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki
On 18 Jan, 2016, at 8:35, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:23:30 AM Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: >> On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >>> I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think >>> it

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-18 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:23:30 AM Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote: > On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think > > it needs much more work before it could be uploaded (let alone my > > objections

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-17 Thread Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki
On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:21 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS > > I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think it > needs much

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-15 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:21 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think it needs much more work before it could be uploaded (let alone my objections against

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-15 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:52:17 PM Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > Of course I think MooseFS is better, I'd much appreciate if you could elaborate on details how MooseFS is better. I could not find anything to support that claim. > Apart this I don't think, that LizardFS maintainer would "replace"

Re: Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-15 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:44:16 PM Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > > If you loose Master Server, user action is needed: he can run another > > Master Server e.g. basing on medatada collected on Metalogger (sometadata > > is *not* lost) or

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system)

2016-01-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > I forgot to mention, that there is a fork of MooseFS in Debian repository > already, called LizardFS. Please let the security team know so that they can add the fork to their code copies metadata.

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system)

2016-01-13 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
> On 13 Jan 2016, at 3:53 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > >> I forgot to mention, that there is a fork of MooseFS in Debian repository >> already, called LizardFS. > > Please let the security team know so that they

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > > Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability > > features are available only in the proprietary version of the software. > If you loose Master Server, user action is needed: he can run another >

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
I forgot to mention, that MooseFS fork - LizardFS is a fork of *old* MooseFS version - 1.6.27-5 which is a far behind 2.0.x (stable) or 3.0.x (curent / testing). (Far behind = since MFS 1.6.x a lot of features have been added and a lot of improvements in algorithms have been made, full list is

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
> Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability > features are available only in the proprietary version of the software. Of course. MooseFS components in free version are highly available but Master Server. It means, that if for some reason you loose e.g. whole

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system)

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
I forgot to mention, that there is a fork of MooseFS in Debian repository already, called LizardFS. Best regards, -- Piotr Robert Konopelko MooseFS Technical Support Engineer | moosefs.com

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote: > Distinctive features of MooseFS are: > > * High availability Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability features are available only in the proprietary version of the software. --

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 10:44 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Or a server crashes, or a daemon has a bug, etc... I agree. Best regards, -- Piotr Robert Konopelko

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
X-Debbugs-Cc: piotr.konope...@moosefs.com, debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, d...@moosefs.com Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS Package name : moosefs Version

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
>Il Martedì 12 Gennaio 2016 22:52, Piotr Robert Konopelko > ha scritto: >I forgot to mention, that MooseFS fork - LizardFS is a fork >of *old* MooseFS version - 1.6.27-5 which is a far behind >2.0.x (stable) or 3.0.x (curent / testing). > >(Far behind = since MFS

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
(wrong hotkey) Hi, If you think it is a full and better replacement of LizardFS, you need to talk with LizardFS maintainer, reachable at https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lizardfs.html cheers, Gianfranco

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system

2016-01-12 Thread Piotr Robert Konopelko
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 11:41 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > (wrong hotkey) > Hi, > > If you think it is a full and better replacement of LizardFS, you need to talk > > with LizardFS maintainer, reachable at > https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lizardfs.html