Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Saturday 24 December 2016 11:38:01 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:41:29PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > You use DAEMON_OPTS in the default file, while sysvinit seems to > > > be standardizing on

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:41:29PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > You use DAEMON_OPTS in the default file, while sysvinit seems to be > > standardizing on DAEMON_ARGS to avoid the messy work of later > > migration of conffile

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hi again Pali Rohár, > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Now lintian on mentors shows warning: > > > > package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version > > 10 > > Yes, lintian is simply

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi again Pali Rohár, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Now lintian on mentors shows warning: > > package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version > 10 Yes, lintian is simply wrong/outdated here. It's just a tool to help you find issues, don't blindly follow lintian

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:28:39AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! Now I uploaded new version to mentors. > [...] > So I cannot use init-d-script easily. [...] Thanks for following up with a good explanation for the choices you make. [...] > Reasons why I did not install systemd service file:

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hello, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:18:03AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi there, > > sorry for the formatting, writing this on my phone. > > > Am 23. Dezember 2016 10:18:52 MEZ, schrieb Andreas Henriksson > : [...] > >on upstream issue #2. > > I'm not sure that'll work.

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Friday 23 December 2016 11:28:39 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > - debian/compat: why only 9? compat 10 is considered stable now > > > > > >and unless you have a good reason I would recommend that any > > >new package should use compat 10. (please read the debhelper > > >manual though

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi! Now I uploaded new version to mentors. On Friday 23 December 2016 10:18:52 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello, > > Started looking at this bug report yesterday but got discracted... > > I spotted much the same issues as Chrisian so I'll instead just > echo what he's saying and add a few

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi there, sorry for the formatting, writing this on my phone. Am 23. Dezember 2016 10:18:52 MEZ, schrieb Andreas Henriksson : >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12:17AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> - init.d: this file name works with dh_installinit, but is not >>

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hello, Started looking at this bug report yesterday but got discracted... I spotted much the same issues as Chrisian so I'll instead just echo what he's saying and add a few comments. (I'll be able to sponsor you once the package is ready.) On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12:17AM +0100, Christian

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi, as announced on IRC, I'm just doing a review, since I'm not a DD and can't sponsor: - packaging in a VCS would be nice to have (plus the appropriate Vcs-Browser / Vcs-... headers in d/control) - debian/copyright: * Tobias Klauser wasn't just active in 2016, the earliest

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Updated to version 0.2.1-1 https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/llmnrd/llmnrd_0.2.1-1.dsc -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "llmnrd" * Package name: llmnrd Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Tobias Klauser * URL : https://github.com/tklauser/llmnrd * License