Dear Patrick,
Please accept my apologies for allowing this RFS to fall through the
cracks.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:30:00AM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> The new version is here:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drgeo/drgeo_1.1.0-10.3.dsc
You've written
- All
drgeo is not in jessie and won't be in stretch, so there is no need to
hurry with patching this upstream version from 2005.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/archive/drgeo/log/
This looks very dead.
#736535 mentions an active fork (that seems to be quite different).
Yes, it use the pharo framework
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:19:35PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> > > > * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
> >
> > Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
> >
> > What is the source of the patch you have
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hello,
>I did the patch myself.
do you really need to patch:
Makefile.in.in
and add a new config.rpath file?
also, please drop the last part of the patch:
@@ -443,4 +443,4 @@
;(new-figure "Ma figure")
;(define a (Numeric "a" 'free 0 0 1))
-;(define p (Point "o"
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
What is the source of the patch you have added?
I did the patch myself.
Also, your changelog needs to be much more detailed.
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
What is the source of the patch you have added? It is not indicated
anywhere. Did it come from upstream?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drgeo"
* Package name: drgeo
Version : 1.1.0-10.3
Upstream Author : https://mentors.debian.net/package/drgeo
* URL : http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Dr._geo
*
7 matches
Mail list logo
