Bug#861757: RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]

在 2017年5月4日星期四 CST 上午8:09:13，Paul Wise 写道： > On Thu, 4 May 2017 00:38:24 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure .otf are the real sources, despite the upstream > > providing only otf. For now, let's assume they are, unless there's > > evidence to the contrary (not sure what the

Bug#861757: RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]

在 2017年5月4日星期四 +08 上午8:09:13，Paul Wise 写道： > The README is pretty clear that the fonts are compile to OpenType using > AFDKO from FontForge and or Inkscape source. AFDKO is not in Debian > main so this font should go to contrib. In addition, no FontForge > source format or SVG files were released

Bug#861757: RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]

On Thu, 4 May 2017 00:38:24 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > I'm not entirely sure .otf are the real sources, despite the upstream > providing only otf.  For now, let's assume they are, unless there's evidence > to the contrary (not sure what the README means). The README is pretty clear that the

Bug#861757: RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-fandol" * Package name: fonts-fandol Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Clerk Ma * URL : https://www.ctan.org/pkg/fandol * License