Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the update! On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:41:01PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > I've uploaded new 1.19.0.2-1 version to mentors.d.o. > I've added manpages, fixed copyright info, fixed alternatives > and enabled auto-tests. Could you please review it?

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hello, I've uploaded new 1.19.0.2-1 version to mentors.d.o. I've added manpages, fixed copyright info, fixed alternatives and enabled auto-tests. Could you please review it? сб, 2 июн. 2018 г. в 7:08, Lumin : > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote: > > Please fix the

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote: > Please fix the aforementioned problems. Hopefully we'll have the last > round of check next time. Thank you for working on this. > > [1] > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/odp/1.19.0.1-1/buildlog Forgot to check the

Bug#896970: Info received (Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP])

Forgot to check the copyright ... The copyright looks incomplete. A simple search on the source tree would reveal many non-Linaro copyright holders: grep -ri copyright | grep -vi linaro | grep -i copyright The package will be rejected by ftp-master if we don't fix the copyright.

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:40:48PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > 1. README.Debian > >"Library packages should contain libodp-linux.so.FOO" > >It should be "libodp-linux.so.SOVER", which is more precise. > > Hmm. I have checked buster package lists. Only blas/lapack packages >

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hello, Thank for your review. 2018-05-25 9:31 GMT+03:00 Lumin : > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. > > Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a > different

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a different source. > 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hello, I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : > I will make my next upload use alternatives, thank you. This upload uses alternatives to select ODP library to be used. >> * move all the executables to

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hello, 2018-05-05 16:47 GMT+03:00 Lumin : > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev >> > seems not exist. >> >> Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev > > seems not exist. > > Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package, > provided by different implementations of ODP API. We are

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Dimitry, I'm keeping an eye on the list and these bugs. I know that your package needs to be checked, but these days I'm a little busy dealing with real life work so that I postponed reviewing packages. I'll review and give you feedbacks in this weekend. On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 22:21 Dmitry

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 Hi Lumin, I've updated ODP package on mentors.d.n, according to most of your comments. Could you please review it? -- With best wishes Dmitry -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 For the reference I've uploaded a preview of ODP-DPDK 1.19.0.0 package to mentors.d.n. It features library and -dev packages, which provide libodp-linux119 and libodp-linux-dev packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 Hi Lumin, I have uploaded next iteration of ODP package to mentors.d.n. It fixes all issues you have pointed out, except issues 5, 6, 10, 11. I'd like your advice wrt points 5 and 10 (we would like to keep virtual packages in place). For

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 > 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev Added. > 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g. > > W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic I will try to. Privacy breaches come from generated documentation. > 3. debhelper compat

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hi Dmitry, Thank you for this package. Here are some problems found in your package: 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g. W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic 3. debhelper compat level and

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odp" * Package name: odp Version : 1.19.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Linaro / ODP community * URL : https://www.opendataplane.org/ * License : [fill in] Section