Hello!
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 23:09 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> On 2021-04-14 18:39 +, Marius Gripsgard wrote:
>
> > I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual
> > work. Did you ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sent upstream
> > patches? If a fork is the way you want to go
Hi,
I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual work. Did you
ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sendt upstream patches? If a fork is the
way you want to go, you will need to rename it as the existing packages need to
follow upstream, we can't just rip an existing package
On 2021-04-14 18:39 +, Marius Gripsgard wrote:
> I would really like to avoid a fork, it's not worth doing dual
> work. Did you ping ofono devs at irc? Also have you sent upstream
> patches? If a fork is the way you want to go, you will need to
> rename it as the existing packages need to fol
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:42 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> I don't think forking ofono is good idea.
I'd like to point out that this isn't ofono that is being forked, but mmsd.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hi!
> In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I have
> been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best course of
> action for packaging mmsd into Debian is to simply fork the project and
> submit my version upstream for packaging in Debian. My repository is
> he
Hello All,
In talking to the Debian Developer Mr. Federico Ceratto, since I have
been unable to get a hold of the Ofono Maintainers, the best course of
action for packaging mmsd into Debian is to simply fork the project and
submit my version upstream for packaging in Debian. My repository is
here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
