[Note: This is a Debian Women event, and I'm trying to advertise it on
places were interested people might be reading. Help spreading the
word is appreciated].
Are you enthusiastic about Debian and thinking about contributing? We
want to guide you with the basics.
We are convinced that there are
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:26:43AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all!
>
> I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU
> (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version
> 2:1.2-2
> When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebu
On Son, 11 Dez 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > tipa_2%3a1.2-2_all.deb
>
> If the epoch should've been in the .deb, it'd be ':', not '%3a' (which
> is the URL escaping of it, and this is the filename, not the URL).
>
> This is correct -- the epoch is *not* included in the filenames.
Ah
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:26:43AM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all!
>
> I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU
> (maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version
> 2:1.2-2
> When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebu
Dear all!
I have a question concerning packages with epoch: We are preparing a NMU
(maintainer approved) for tipa which currently is of version
2:1.2-2
When I get the source package via apt-get source tipa and rebuild the
package with
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot
I get a bi
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> [...]
> ... if you use dh_gencontrol(1), or invoke dpkg-gencontrol manually. Of
> course a package can also be created along
>
> mkdir tmp
> cp whatnot/ tmp/
> mkdir tmp/DEBIAN
> cat >tmp/DEBIAN/control
> type whatever you li
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> > But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
> > is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
> > perl) in /usr/bin are no
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 05:05:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> > But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there
> > is no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one
> > perl) in /usr/bin are n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
> no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
> in /usr/bin are not executable.
Files in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 22 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
> no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
> in /usr/bin are not executable.
Files in
Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
> no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
> in /usr/bin are not executable.
diff does not maintain executable bits.
So, any file that
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:09:00 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you try running pdebuild (with no arguments) in the source
> directory, please, rather than "pbuilder build .dsc". This problem may
> be caused by a error in your .dsc file.
The problem *was* caused by an error: Becaus
Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> But I have another problem: When I build the package with debuild there is
> no problem, when I build with pdebuild, all scripts (one bash, one perl)
> in /usr/bin are not executable.
diff does not maintain executable bits.
So, any file that
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:09:00 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you try running pdebuild (with no arguments) in the source
> directory, please, rather than "pbuilder build .dsc". This problem may
> be caused by a error in your .dsc file.
The problem *was* caused by an error: Becau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 22:52, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> When I run pbuilder build dsc (as root) I get:
> --
> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-buildpackage: line 1: kill: (19113) - No su
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:54 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try putting xibs-dev in your build-dep. Using pbuilder is a good may to
> ensure that you have the correct build-deps, as well. :)
Yesterday it did not work, today it works. Perhaps a mistake in writing...
> Oh, I might a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 22:52, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> When I run pbuilder build dsc (as root) I get:
> --
> /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-buildpackage: line 1: kill: (19113) - No s
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:12:54 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try putting xibs-dev in your build-dep. Using pbuilder is a good may to
> ensure that you have the correct build-deps, as well. :)
Yesterday it did not work, today it works. Perhaps a mistake in writing...
> Oh, I might
Hallo! Du (Joey Hess) hast geschrieben:
>Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> > SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
>> > SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
>
>That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
>heard about spamcop's pro
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
> > SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity for flagging things like legit list ser
Hallo! Du (Joey Hess) hast geschrieben:
>Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> > SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
>> > SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
>
>That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
>heard about spamcop's pr
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > SPAM: * 4.5 -- RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
> > SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
That score should probably be reduced to, oh, 1 or so, given what I've
heard about spamcop's propensity for flagging things like legit list se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
> "pbuilder build ...dsc" (the file was created with debuild) I get from
> "dh_shlibdeps" the message:
>
> dpkg-shlibd
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Is really usefull to rebuild a bounce of packages from unstable to
> stable in a single shot.
I'd be interested in that script too!
regards, Stefan
--
> http://www.shockfrosted.org
As already said use pbuilder.
Next if you like I have written a script that, given a .dsc in the local
file system, rebuild it using a pbuilder environment, test for the
successfull compilation, copy the generated debs in an apt-gettable
repository and rebuild the dists/* stuff of that repository.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 September 2002 07:37, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
> "pbuilder build ...dsc" (the file was created with debuild) I get from
> "dh_shlibdeps" the message:
>
> dpkg-shlib
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Is really usefull to rebuild a bounce of packages from unstable to
> stable in a single shot.
I'd be interested in that script too!
regards, Stefan
--
> http://www.shockfrosted.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
As already said use pbuilder.
Next if you like I have written a script that, given a .dsc in the local
file system, rebuild it using a pbuilder environment, test for the
successfull compilation, copy the generated debs in an apt-gettable
repository and rebuild the dists/* stuff of that repository
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:42:23 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Install the pbuilder package, read the documentation, create a Woody
> chroot, build your packages in the chroot.
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
"pbuilder build ...dsc" (the file
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:42:23 +0100
Paul Cupis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Install the pbuilder package, read the documentation, create a Woody
> chroot, build your packages in the chroot.
Thanks, it works (almost) fine. But I have a little problem. When I start
"pbuilder build ...dsc" (the file
p.net
> SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
> SPAM:
> SPAM: End of SpamAssassin results
>
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
>
p.net
> SPAM: [RBL check: found 214.224.20.195.bl.spamcop.net.]
> SPAM:
> SPAM: End of SpamAssassin results
>
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 September 2002 22:21, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
> Building packages
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
> Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
> shlibs:Depends) of
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6 at least at the version used on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 September 2002 22:21, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
> Building packages
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Holger Kubiak wrote:
> I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
> I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
> Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
> shlibs:Depends) of
Hello,
I want to build a package on my computer for several other hosts at work.
I use unstable but on some other hosts there is stable. My problem is:
Building packages with debhelper causes a dependency (expanded from
shlibs:Depends) of the package libc6 at least at the version used on my
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 04:26:02PM +0100, William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am relatively new at attempting to build source/binary packages. I've
> been looking for information online and this is what I have to go on. Any
> pointers would be really helpful.
>
> The first thing that I did was to use dp
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 04:26:02PM +0100, William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am relatively new at attempting to build source/binary packages. I've
> been looking for information online and this is what I have to go on. Any
> pointers would be really helpful.
>
> The first thing that I did was to use d
do:
# apt-get install hello
# apt-get install hello-debhelper
# apt-get source hello
# apt-get source hello-debhelper
and have a look at those packages.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux
do:
# apt-get install hello
# apt-get install hello-debhelper
# apt-get source hello
# apt-get source hello-debhelper
and have a look at those packages.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 04:26:02PM +0100, William wrote:
> I am relatively new at attempting to build source/binary packages. I've
> been looking for information online and this is what I have to go on. Any
> pointers would be really helpful.
>
> The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb.
William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb. My first question
> is, what are control/changelog files and how would I create one?
> Everytime I try to package something, it tries to locate
> 'debian/control' or 'debian/changelog'. The only thing that seem
William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb. My first question
> is, what are control/changelog files and how would I create one?
> Everytime I try to package something, it tries to locate
> 'debian/control' or 'debian/changelog'. The only thing that see
Hi,
I am relatively new at attempting to build source/binary packages. I've
been looking for information online and this is what I have to go on. Any
pointers would be really helpful.
The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb. My first question is,
what are control/changelog files and how
Hi,
I am relatively new at attempting to build source/binary packages. I've
been looking for information online and this is what I have to go on. Any
pointers would be really helpful.
The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb. My first question is,
what are control/changelog files and ho
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> All help, suggestions, comments, much appreciated. Thanks
Please read the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" at [1]. That's a good
written tutorial for beginners and reading it should answer your
questions.
> Holgar Ostermann
cu
Adrian
[1] http:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
[...]
> Second question, when using dpkg-buildpackage, it creates the diff. But when
> I've changed a few files (such as .c ones) and have so
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> All help, suggestions, comments, much appreciated. Thanks
Please read the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" at [1]. That's a good
written tutorial for beginners and reading it should answer your
questions.
> Holgar Ostermann
cu
Adrian
[1] http
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
[...]
> Second question, when using dpkg-buildpackage, it creates the diff. But when
> I've changed a few files (such as .c ones) and have s
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:46:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
>
> First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
> number? I've read the man, the docs, and
Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
number? I've read the man, the docs, and so on, and can't find this. I mean, if
I have a package -3.2 dh_make returns
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:46:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
> dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
>
> First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
> number? I've read the man, the docs, an
Hello. I have two, simple, questions about building a Debian package using
dh_make and dpkg-buildpackage.
First question, when I use dh_make how can I get it to insert as revision
number? I've read the man, the docs, and so on, and can't find this. I mean, if
I have a package -3.2 dh_make returns
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:15:43AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> > I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> > want to ha
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:15:43AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> > I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> > want to h
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian mac
How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian ma
How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, is it possible to logon to pandora and build these packages without
> having root access. Is that the purpose of the fakeroot package?
Should be if the -dev packages you need are installed.
> Also, if I could build packages on kubrick and fau
I've recently opened my eyes to realize that Debian has several
development machines on the internet.
Specifically, I would like to upload a Gtk-- package but, locally, I
have had to rebuild the gtkmm packages in unstable in order to avoid
upgrading my C++ compiler which would b
63 matches
Mail list logo
