Dependency problem

2011-08-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
Hi! Is it possible to specify the following type of package dependency? Either python-wxgtk2.8 or python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl or python-fltk or python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1 Or would I need to create meta-packages and use something like: python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-and-qt4-gl-meta

Re: Dependency problem

2011-08-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com, 2011-08-11, 17:52: Either python-wxgtk2.8 or python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl or python-fltk or python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1 You can use something as ugly as: Depends: python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtk2,

Re: Dependency problem

2011-08-11 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
On 11/08/11 18:23, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com, 2011-08-11, 17:52: Either python-wxgtk2.8 or python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl or python-fltk or python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1 You can use something as ugly as: Depends: python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 |

Re: Dependency problem

2011-08-11 Thread Michael Tautschnig
[...] You can use something as ugly as: Depends: python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtk2, python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtkglext1, python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-gl | python-fltk | python-gtk2, python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-gl | python-fltk |

Re: Dependency problem

2011-08-11 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.08.2011 19:04, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I wish I could do something as simple as Depends: python-wxgtk2.8 | (python-qt4, python-qt4-gl) | python-fltk | (python-gtk2, gtkglext1) I'm pretty sure someone suggested such a syntax

Re: libwww0 dependency problem on new architecture

2005-08-28 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 28 August 2005 00:31, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: While trying to bootstrap debian sarge for a new architecture*, I'm having some problems while building the w3c-libwww package. In short, the regular sarge arm

libwww0 dependency problem on new architecture

2005-08-27 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
Hi! I'm not sure whether this is the right mailing list to ask this question -- if it's not, I apologise, and would appreciate a pointer to a better place to ask this question. Thanks. While trying to bootstrap debian sarge for a new architecture*, I'm having some problems while building the

Re: libwww0 dependency problem on new architecture

2005-08-27 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: While trying to bootstrap debian sarge for a new architecture*, I'm having some problems while building the w3c-libwww package. In short, the regular sarge arm libwww0 package has the following control directives:

Re: libwww0 dependency problem on new architecture

2005-08-27 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:31:40PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: Actually, if I try to rebuild sarge w3c-libwww on a clean sarge install, I also get the depends+conflicts overlap: I just tried and encountered serious problems building the libwww packages. It seems that something about the

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it. Just think someone else is using your library (like qgis) and he will run

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Silke Reimer
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:06:44AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Silke, My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it.

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it. Just think someone else is using your library (like qgis) and he will run

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Silke Reimer
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 09:06:44AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Silke, My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it.

Dependency problem

2004-08-07 Thread Silke Reimer
Hallo! I am the sponsored maintainer of gdal. Since I have some open bugs I am preparing a new package, but I have a problem where I don't know what to insert in the dependency field of a package. Please look at bug number 25344 [1]: python-gdal contains the python bindings for libgdal1 and

Dependency problem

2004-08-07 Thread Silke Reimer
Hallo! I am the sponsored maintainer of gdal. Since I have some open bugs I am preparing a new package, but I have a problem where I don't know what to insert in the dependency field of a package. Please look at bug number 25344 [1]: python-gdal contains the python bindings for libgdal1 and

Re: binutils-dev dependency problem...

2002-09-10 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Adam Moreover, binutils-dev description says: Adam Note that building Debian packages which depend on the shared Adam libbfd is Not Allowed. Adam So what should I do to fix the problems? Link whole package Adam staticaly?? Thanks in advance for your help... This is actually quite

binutils-dev dependency problem...

2002-09-10 Thread Adam Byrtek
Hi, I have a package 'fenris', which depends on libbfd. The problem is it depends on the EXACT version of the library: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd which fenris libbfd-2.12.90.0.1.so = /usr/lib/libbfd-2.12.90.0.1.so (0x40049000) ... and my package has to depend on exactly the same version of

Re: binutils-dev dependency problem...

2002-09-10 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Adam Moreover, binutils-dev description says: Adam Note that building Debian packages which depend on the shared Adam libbfd is Not Allowed. Adam So what should I do to fix the problems? Link whole package Adam staticaly?? Thanks in advance for your help... This is actually quite interesting.

library dependency problem

1999-07-26 Thread Jim Mintha
I have a problem with the slang library. The current version is slang1_1.2.2 I began to package the new version 1.3.8. I installed it on my own system to test and everything went fine. However when I upgraded to the latest potato anything depending on slang1 broke because they all had depends

Re: library dependency problem

1999-07-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 02:19:33AM +0200, Jim Mintha wrote: I have a problem with the slang library. The current version is slang1_1.2.2 I began to package the new version 1.3.8. I installed it on my own system to test and everything went fine. However when I upgraded to the latest potato

Re: library dependency problem

1999-07-26 Thread James Mastros
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 02:19:33AM +0200, Jim Mintha wrote: slang1 ( 1.3), slang1 ( 1.2.2-0) When I took over the slang1 package I failed to notice the shlibs that defined the above. The problem is that version 1.3.x is compatible with 1.2. This leaves me with a number of options: Hmm,

help: dependency problem

1999-05-04 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello List ! I can't get rid of my dependency problems. (MySQL has more conflicts than any soap opera :-)) Maybe someone can give me a hint ! Here is the current situation: (src: mysql - non-free) mysql server + docs mysql-clientclient + all libraries