On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:32:17 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:32:17 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
Bug #79854 says that I should probably remove INSTALL.gz from my
package, presumably because it contains only the "Generic Installation
Instructions" that other packages like irssi and findutils contain as
well.
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
installed (it would not do any good for it to be installed, since the user
does the
Bug #79854 says that I should probably remove INSTALL.gz from my
package, presumably because it contains only the Generic Installation
Instructions that other packages like irssi and findutils contain as
well.
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
installed (it would not do any good for it to be installed, since the user
does the
6 matches
Mail list logo
