On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:59:42PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On 02/07/07, Neil Williams wrote:
[snip]
It only seems to increase the risk of mysterious bugs if you are using
two different fortran libraries that are built against *VERY* different
compilers : gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.2. Having one
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:48:11PM +, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
You might be interested to learn of the proposed release goal for lenny
of removing g77/gcc-3.4 in favor of gfortran. Read all about it at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-toolchain/2007/07/msg0.html
Thanks for the tip. I'll
Dear Neil,
I have a new package ready at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc
On 01/07/07, Neil Williams wrote:
A -dbg package needs to be provided.
(-dbg packages are likely to become mandatory by Lenny.)
Done this.
In practical terms, not all
On 02/07/07, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I have a new package ready at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc
And I just spoke to upstream about this issue. The author has assured
me that no feature will be missing if I have have LAPACK, BLAS and
FFTW3. This means
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:34:42 +0530
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a new package ready at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc
Minor problems:
1. libittp6 describes itself as:
C++ signal processing and communication library: Debug symbols
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:39:20 +0530
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/07/07, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I have a new package ready at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc
And I just spoke to upstream about this issue. The author has assured
me
On 02/07/07, Neil Williams wrote:
Minor problems:
1. libittp6 describes itself as:
C++ signal processing and communication library: Debug symbols
which is the same as libittp6-dbg:
C++ signal processing and communication library: Debug symbols
Remove the : Debug symbols from the description of
On 02/07/07, Neil Williams wrote:
Is this the same cblas as usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 in libgsl0
http://packages.debian.org/stable/math/libgsl0
?
This is what I was referring to.
libgsl0 may be large but it doesn't bring in any extraneous
dependencies.
I'll give it a shot.
It only seems
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:49:38 +0530
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. debian/changelog: experimental. I'm just checking - is this version
to be uploaded to experimental or is this a hangover from the previous
version? Change to unstable?
Well, the situation is like this: the
Dear Neil,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:03:54PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
version? Change to unstable?
Based on your advice, the destination is now unstable. It's not worth
tracking two separate streams when the real features are in this
one. Also, it doesn't _break_ anything (other than
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:51:33 +0530
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.99.2-1
of my package libitpp.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libitpp.html
When asking for a sponsor, please mention whether the package already
exists in Debian - i.e.
Neil Williams codehelp at debian.org writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.99.2-1
of my package libitpp.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libitpp.html
When asking for a sponsor, please mention whether the package already
exists in Debian - i.e. whether you have had
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 09:58:52 + (UTC)
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Williams codehelp at debian.org writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.99.2-1
of my package libitpp.
When asking for a sponsor, please mention whether the package already
exists in
13 matches
Mail list logo
