On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* history: I haven't seen this argument fly be in (this and other
instances of) this discussion, but the answer is that the proper
place to record that you had an extra and fatal space in your rules
file is your VCS.
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* history: I haven't seen this argument fly be in (this and other
instances of) this discussion, but the answer is that the proper
place to record that
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* history: I haven't seen this argument fly be in (this and other
instances of) this
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 23:46, Martin Meredith m...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* history: I haven't seen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:49:10PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 23:46, Martin Meredith m...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Martin Meredith [Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:05:11 +]:
Hey Martin,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at
Hello. Hopefully I'm not beating a completely dead horse here, but since
some of the proponents of this bump revision with each iteration
scheme are very vocal, I thought I could be very vocal too. I will
(hopefully) not beat this horse again in the near future.
The (in my opinion) most important
Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build a
package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem with it?
Do you, under that scenario, write in the changelog a new bullet point
Oh, I botched the rules file writing `rm -rf $(CURDIR) /usr/lib`, fixed
now,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:29:10 +0100
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:
The (in my opinion) most important reason why we shouldn't ask for
bumping the debian version on each iteration to our sponsorees is a
peculiar one: it's classist, because (in my view of thins) sponsorees
should get
Well, I do not agree with all of Neil's comments, but I think I have something
to say (since the discussion is so hot and long).
I'm just a maintainer. And I'm proud of that. I'm not (Neil knows) a DD nor
want to be one, but I'm really proud of my help to Debian as a maintainer and
as a
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build
a package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem
with it?
No. I bump the release number the next time I make a change after
having uploaded a release.
--
\
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/01/2009):
Do you, as a developer, bump the debian revision each time you build
a package, are ready to upload it, and discover one final problem
with it? Do you, under that scenario, write in the changelog a new
bullet point Oh, I botched the rules
11 matches
Mail list logo
