On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 01:17:02PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Brandon Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we allowed to disable compiler warnings? What is the preferred
method, if the code is fine, and would require a huge overhaul to fix?
IANADD
However, my feeling is, the less
Are we allowed to disable compiler warnings? What is the preferred
method, if the code is fine, and would require a huge overhaul to fix?
Specifically, I am thinking of trigraphs. If you know what they are,
you probably know exactly how I feel. If you don't, they are a seldom
used feature, and
Brandon Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we allowed to disable compiler warnings? What is the preferred
method, if the code is fine, and would require a huge overhaul to fix?
IANADD
However, my feeling is, the less change to a package you have to do to get
it working, the better. If the
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:54:17 -0800
Brandon Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we allowed to disable compiler warnings? What is the preferred
method, if the code is fine, and would require a huge overhaul to fix?
Warnings are only a problem if -Werror is also set. If upstream don't
use
I demand that Neil Williams may or may not have written...
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:54:17 -0800 Brandon Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we allowed to disable compiler warnings? What is the preferred method,
if the code is fine, and would require a huge overhaul to fix?
Warnings are only a
Thanks for the input. I guess the answer is, no official policy beyond
standard good programming practice. I thought maybe somewhere it was
written Thou shalt not suppress any warnings! Wanted to make sure
before I did anything like that.
In my own projects, I make sure they don't give off any
6 matches
Mail list logo
