On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:00:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
RFS has something similar in concept to pull requests. How about including in
the RFS emails a link to the most relevant diff in the web
Le Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:00:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
RFS has something similar in concept to pull requests. How about including in
the RFS emails a link to the most relevant diff in the web interface of the
VCS
where the package is
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list on
mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more
comprehensive list of
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people please review some package is
pretty awkward...
Best regards,
Michael
Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list
on
mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more
comprehensive list of packages in need of sponsorship, this
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
Unfortunately, proposals such as the collaborative package review by Charles
Plessy [2] haven't caught any attention. In particular, this is a call to
people
not being DD (yet): Everyone could review packages,
Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this
list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are
ignoring non-DDs input.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this
list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are
ignoring non-DDs input.
Me too, probably I'll even refrain from sponsoring should I note such behavior.
Best regards,
Michael
pgpWQgPPBsI8a.pgp
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Personally I believe that Noel's statement is relates to upstream,
who have their own packaging + their own little repository as
compared to upstreams like you, who also work on the Debian side.
[...]
Which was more or less my
[...]
Hmm, how can we encourage non-DDs to review packages.
I'm thinking it might work to offer sponsorship in exchange for
reviews. So, a DD reviews a package from maintainer. If there are no
blockers to the upload, the DD says, looks good, review someone elses
package and I'll
Hello,
On Friday 29 October 2010 at 20:13:21, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 08:34:25 Paul Wise escribió:
[...]
I think I'll also do a workshop about reviewing packages at the
MiniDebConf in Vietnam. Does anyone think that an online workshop (IRC
or similar) about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people please review some package
is
pretty awkward...
Best
Quoting Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org:
Hi Michael,
I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably
should have
taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 02:16, The Fungi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
[...]
Is it always an upstream package worst than a repackaged package?
[...]
From what I've seen, in most cases, yes.
I am one of
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of
packages
that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people please review some
package is
pretty awkward...
Best regards,
Michael
Asheesh: Sounds
[...]
I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably should have
taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
those people another email.
[...]
Done as [1].
Hi all,
Following Asheesh's proposal [1] we should try to reply to a post to
debian-mentors within four days. I felt there was an increased willingness to
kindly reply to RFS following this proposal, but it seems to have decreased
again. Myself, I'd be willing to keep up this kind service to
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
So this was the first time I dragged together such a list, and most probably
it
will already be the last time. It just takes way too much time and feels
pretty
much like a Sisyphus task as people just keep sending
On 10/29/2010 03:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
I think I'll also do a workshop about reviewing packages at the
MiniDebConf in Vietnam. Does anyone think that an online workshop (IRC
or similar) about package review would be helpful?
Paul,
I'll try to bring my DVD cam, so we can film all
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 08:34:25 Paul Wise escribió:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
So this was the first time I dragged together such a list, and most
probably it will already be the last time. It just takes way too much
time and feels pretty
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org writes:
I see a small problem with this, and it is the following: imagine that
somebody packages a useful application. He has no special interest in
Debian, but only in that application, and it is an application we
consider worth enough to have in
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 22:05:40 Ben Finney escribió:
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org writes:
I see a small problem with this, and it is the following: imagine that
somebody packages a useful application. He has no special interest in
Debian, but only in that application, and
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
[...]
Is it always an upstream package worst than a repackaged package?
[...]
From what I've seen, in most cases, yes.
I am one of the guilty one pet package upstream authors who gets
my Debian work uploaded by a gracious
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org writes:
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 22:05:40 Ben Finney escribió:
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org writes:
That person creates the Debian package (as he creates packages for
other distros) and puts it here. It is a good package of a
24 matches
Mail list logo
