Re: Override disparity

2006-08-24 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Russ, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Which leads us to this question: do *-doc packages belong in section doc, or in whatever the main package is (science, in this case)? I prefer putting them in the same section as the main package so

Re: Override disparity

2006-08-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer putting them in the same section as the main package so that people browsing by section in aptitude will actually see them. I don't like this philosophie. This way packages end up in libs they don't include

Re: Override disparity

2006-08-08 Thread Esteban Manchado Velázquez
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:07:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: [...] Which leads us to this question: do *-doc packages belong in section doc, or in whatever the main package is (science, in this case)? At least linda complains when you have a *-doc package that _isn't_ in Section: doc.

Override disparity

2006-08-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear Mentors, I got the following error in a package I co-maintain: There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): muscle-doc_3.60-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says science. I searched the policy, but did not

Re: Override disparity

2006-08-07 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 22:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): muscle-doc_3.60-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says science. I searched the policy, but did not

Re: Override disparity

2006-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Which leads us to this question: do *-doc packages belong in section doc, or in whatever the main package is (science, in this case)? I prefer putting them in the same section as the main package so that people browsing by section in aptitude will

Re: Override disparity

2006-08-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:18:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : I prefer putting them in the same section as the main package so that people browsing by section in aptitude will actually see them. You make a point. I really have no opinion as I am using apt-get in command line and I am

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: override disparity

2005-03-15 Thread Osamu Aoki
] Subject: maint-guide override disparity To: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:17:13 -0500 X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 5.8907 ) There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): maint-guide

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: override disparity

2005-03-15 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:01:06AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: I got attached messages for this and previous upload of maint-guide. (I changed everything other than english to extra in this upload since they are secondary info.) What should I do? AIUI, you should file a bug on ftp.debian.org,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: override disparity

2005-03-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:27:47PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:01:06AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: I got attached messages for this and previous upload of maint-guide. (I changed everything other than english to extra in this upload since they are secondary info.)