Re: Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-28 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Mon, Jun 27, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > So what package is this, and why are those functions in the shared library > at all? It's gst-plugins0.8 (and to some extent gstreamer0.8), where upstream plugins might use some internal non-API functions, but others shouldn't. The in

Re: Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > I'm in a situation where I'd like to bump dependencies in binary > packages of a source package to >= upstream version when they > interdepend on each other. > This is somewhat similar to adding a (= ${Source-Version}) constraint i

Re: Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005, Brian Nelson wrote: > W: aspell-bin: package-has-a-duplicate-relation depends: libaspell15 (>= > 0.60),libaspell15 (= 0.60.2+20050121-3) Ah, I searched for "depends" in the list of lintian warnings. Thanks for pointing this out! -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Neutr

Re: Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-27 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: [...] > In summary, what I want is something like: > debian/control: Depends: ${shlibs-depends}, libfoo (>= x.y) > debian/substvars: shlibs-depends: libfoo (>= x.0) > > => DEBIAN/control: Depends: libfoo (>= x.y) > > Although I did

Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-27 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, I'm in a situation where I'd like to bump dependencies in binary packages of a source package to >= upstream version when they interdepend on each other. This is somewhat similar to adding a (= ${Source-Version}) constraint in spirit and in the implementation. The problem is tha