Hi Alexander.
I have created a trival Debian repository. The relevant line for your
sources.list is:
deb-src http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc /
At the moment I am working through some problems with image generation
using latex2html, which is the first step towards
Terry Burton wrote:
New files available at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc.
Seems pretty OK now.
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing since it relies on TeX modules that are not yet part
of Debian. Hopefully future
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:53:51AM +0100, Terry Burton wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems
exist. You can view the files at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc
After a very brief look, I can only say I saw a lot of
On 06-Sep-2005, Terry Burton wrote:
I'm currently packaging the Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript
project that I have written.
Yay! I like this program, thanks.
Debian Policy mandates that programs have a manpage. Since this is a
PostScript resource (similar to a shared library) does
Hi,
After I have got the source package into good shape, do you have any
advise on finding a package sponser? Any volunteers.
If you don't find a sponsor, have a read of womble's excellent
debian-mentors FAQ[0] (recently updated) and add your sponsorship
request to sponsors.debian.net so it
Terry Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would people please examine the package and tell me what problems
exist. You can view the files at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc
The debian/rules is very bloated, please remove everything which is not
needed and not mandated
Hi,
I've removed the Makefile and made use of dh_install. I've also
slimmed the debian/rules file by removing the commented lines and dh_*
rules that seem redundant, as suggested. I would appreciate it if
someone could offer any assistance in further tidying this up.
It is now also building for
Hi,
Hi,
I've removed the Makefile and made use of dh_install. I've also
slimmed the debian/rules file by removing the commented lines and dh_*
rules that seem redundant, as suggested. I would appreciate it if
someone could offer any assistance in further tidying this up.
Generally, you just
Okay, next round :-)
Please recheck files at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc.
Target is now /usr/share/libpostscriptbarcode, not
/usr/lib/libpostscriptbarcode.
Created debian/install file to simplify debian/rules.
Added -X option to dh_installdocs to prevent
Hi,
sorry for this, but I think another round might be required:
1. move sample.ps, barcode_with_sample.ps, docs/* from debian/install to
debian/docs.
2. I think you should just remove the Depends line (as far as I understand
the thing you could just cat barcode_with_sample.ps /dev/lp0 and it
Hi,
Thanks for all of your assistance Eric.
New files available at
http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter/files/debiansrc.
Documentation files moved from debian/install to debian/docs.
Depends removed.
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote on 06/09/2005 12:29:
There is no Debian package without a Depends line,
as you always need something else to properly use it.
This is not true. For an example look at busybox-static gcc-4.0-base or
libc6:
aptitude show busybox-static gcc-4.0-base libc6
cu,
sven
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
There is no Debian
package without a Depends line, as you always need something else to
properly use it.
Actually, there are over 1500 of them. Some packages survive with the
Essentials :)
$ grep-dctrl -c -FDepends -e '^$' \
I would prefer not to have to regenerate the documentation from TeX
for the timebeing since it relies on TeX modules that are not yet part
of Debian. Hopefully future Debian releases of the PSTricks packages
will remedy this situation making this a sensible option. It would
also seem a bit
14 matches
Mail list logo
