On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 19:12, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/11/2008):
>> yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to
>> retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […]
>
> FSVO "have to". It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9.
Thanks Ki
Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/11/2008):
> yes it it: you have to provide a programmatical way to
> retrive/generate the orig.tar.gz […]
FSVO “have to”. It is clearly tagged as optional in Policy §4.9.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:20, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sandro Tosi schreef:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format fo
Sandro Tosi schreef:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn
revisions?
Right now I have something like +svn.
Here[1] you can find some information on this item, and on writing
get-orig-
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:45, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn
> revisions?
> Right now I have something like +svn.
Here[1] you can find some information on this item, and on writing
get-orig-source debi
On 2008-11-09, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn
> revisions?
> Right now I have something like +svn.
If it is a snapshot after a release, I also do that.
If it is a snapshot leadi
Hello,
Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn revisions?
Right now I have something like +svn.
Regards,
Guido Loupias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo