Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-08 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
2008/12/8 Eric Lavarde - Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You might be able to find fun-friends on the debian-java mailing list (I > don't volunteer :-( ), Understood. I'll go that route. Yay, another Debian mailing list to join. This one will be the ninth. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-08 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso said: > 2008/12/7 Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Looking quickly through the binary download, you might have quite a lot >> of >> fun (JOGL is in Debian, Gluegen isn't, JNA neither, Antlr is there, dxf >> viewer not, etc...) > > Ack. I hadn't noticed those files.

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:49:27PM +0200, George Danchev a écrit : > > I hope that you pay extra attention to such codebases, since if they are > prone > of doing such a "software engeneering" lightly and at large, they are quite > likely to be prone of embaking on even more ingenious initiativ

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-07 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 07 December 2008 19:21:26 Eric Lavarde wrote: > > BTW, code duplication isn't liked in Debian, so it is probably best to > > package whatever it is you found separately and then make processing > > depend on that. > > Agree, many Java projects package their sources with the libraries the

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-07 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
2008/12/7 Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Looking quickly through the binary download, you might have quite a lot of > fun (JOGL is in Debian, Gluegen isn't, JNA neither, Antlr is there, dxf > viewer not, etc...) Ack. I hadn't noticed those files. But now I looked... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-07 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Three, and here my Java ignorance begins to show, I see that the upstream source also includes some .jar for which I am not sure I can find the corresponding source. How can I gather more

Re: Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One, there is no upstream tarball. There is a tagged svn release, but > it includes a lot of superfluous software, such as Sun's non-free JRE > (OpenJDK seems to work fine now), and build environments for Windows

Processing (#433270), no upstream tarball, other questions

2008-12-06 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
Hi. I've gotten motivated again to close Processing's ITP bug #433270, since Processing has gone out of beta recently, and OpenJDK seems to be able to handle it now. There are a few problems. One, there is no upstream tarball. There is a tagged svn release, but it includes a lot of superfluous so