Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-09-06 Thread Brandon
* -fPIC is only used when building the .so file but not when compiling the source files (is it ok this way?) No, it is not ok that way. Follow this link. It also answers your question regarding -fPIC and static linking (short answer, also not ok):

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-09-06 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:15:28AM -0700, Brandon wrote: I'm not sure how to actually handle replacing the files. Is it ok to put them into the orig.tar.gz? I'm sure the answer is in the policy manual somewhere. The orig.tar.gz can't have any files introduced relative to upstream. * lintian

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-18 Thread Raphael Geissert
Sorry for the late response. On 17/08/07, Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/17/07, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday night I uploaded to mentors a new version of the package. Changes: * debhelper files are now generated from templates so the package version

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-17 Thread Raphael Geissert
Yesterday night I uploaded to mentors a new version of the package. Changes: * debhelper files are now generated from templates so the package version information (except debian/control) is updated automatically by debian/rules. * Added -dbg package * Added -D_REENTRANT * $(version) and $(major)

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-17 Thread Andres Mejia
On 8/17/07, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday night I uploaded to mentors a new version of the package. Changes: * debhelper files are now generated from templates so the package version information (except debian/control) is updated automatically by debian/rules. * Added

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-13 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 10/08/07, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All'incirca Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:47:01 -0500, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] sembrerebbe aver scritto: Hello everybody, I've finally prepared the irrlicht package. As I wrote many hacks to get dpkg-buildpackage successfully

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-13 Thread Raphael
On 10/08/07, Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) It appears that the irrlicht engine is incompatable with the libjpeg engine that comes with debian. I have attached a log with errors. This is from compiling, and then running, 02.Quake3Map. However, after checking the versions, it seems

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-10 Thread Brandon
Keep in mind that irrlicht breaks ABI compatability every release. 1.3.1, for example, is not compatable with 1.3. I just tested this by using your package with a Hello World program that I compiled with 1.3 a while ago. I got a warning that the version of the Irrlicht Engine (1.3.1) did not match

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-10 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
All'incirca Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:47:01 -0500, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] sembrerebbe aver scritto: Hello everybody, I've finally prepared the irrlicht package. As I wrote many hacks to get dpkg-buildpackage successfully build all the different packages I want it to be reviewed and

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-10 Thread Brandon
1) It appears that the irrlicht engine is incompatable with the libjpeg engine that comes with debian. I have attached a log with errors. This is from compiling, and then running, 02.Quake3Map. However, after checking the versions, it seems irrlicht comes with the exact same version as debian, 62

Re: RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-10 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
All'incirca Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:55:22 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] sembrerebbe aver scritto: Thank you for your answers, and good luck to Francois! Ok, I wanted to say Raphael, but I read the wrong name the email summary! Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC: irrlicht

2007-08-09 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hello everybody, I've finally prepared the irrlicht package. As I wrote many hacks to get dpkg-buildpackage successfully build all the different packages I want it to be reviewed and commented. Package name: irrlicht Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Nikolaus Gebhardt [EMAIL