Re: RFS: OpenCPN navigation (ITP #538067)

2012-01-23 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:09:27PM -0800, Hamish wrote: Hi, It's been 5 weeks without response, and no luck finding a sponsor on IRC, so I'll try a repeat posting. :-) It was not evident (at least for me) when you finished with your refinements. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To

Re: RFS: OpenCPN navigation (ITP #538067)

2012-01-19 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 16 January 2012 09:09:27 Hamish wrote: Hi, Hi, (just to summarize the log from IRC session, we had) It's been 5 weeks without response, and no luck finding a sponsor on IRC, so I'll try a repeat posting. :-) Yeah, a lot of effort has been put into making this packaged properly (as

Re: RFS: OpenCPN navigation (ITP #538067)

2012-01-19 Thread Hamish
George Danchev wrote: * long package descriptions should be impoved, and in my opinoin to the point where a person with a driver license could be comfortable to read and understand it :) For instance: the bullet list of bullet of features, should have more explanations; you cold add a