On 23 Jun 2009, at 00:27, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com writes:
Even after removing the \, I still get:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of
this
On 23 Jun 2009, at 00:27, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com writes:
Even after removing the \, I still get:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ah.
* Package name: ah
Version : 0.02-1
Upstream Author : Zhaolei zhaole...@hotmail.com
Maintainer : Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com
* URL :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickardshricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few warnings that I
can't seem to correct (http://pastebin.com/f2ed86daf)
please explain WHY you can't correct them. for example:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 18:56, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickardshricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few warnings that I
can't seem to correct (http://pastebin.com/f2ed86daf)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Harry Rickardshricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 18:56, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 19:39, Harry Rickardshricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean apart from a few
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:39:25 +0100
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ah.
Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
At least that tells me something about what the package can do. Or
maybe something like hex2dec or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 19:45, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:39:25 +0100
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ah.
Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
At least that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/09 19:39, Alexander Toresson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Harry Rickardshricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
...
Thanks for the advice. I've managed to get rid of all of the errors
apart from two. They are:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:41:07 +0100
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ah.
Can't this use a better name, like antihex ?
At least that tells me something about what the package can do. Or
maybe something like hex2dec or similar.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0100
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling the
ITP to use the changed package name.
Just saw, you've already done that. #534242 - thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
On 22 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0100
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling
the
ITP to use the changed package name.
Just saw, you've already done that.
Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com writes:
Even after removing the \, I still get:
W: ah: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/ah.1.gz
ah.1.gz in the deb archive that you pointed to at the beginning of this
thread is a pure text file that's just formatted vaguely like the output
13 matches
Mail list logo
