Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-25 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, it's been almost two weeks now and I still haven't got an answer from the maintainer of parcellite. -- Best regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Henzel Cristian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-25 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-11-25 13:16, Cristian Henzel wrote: Hello, it's been almost two weeks now and I still haven't got an answer from the maintainer of parcellite. -- Best regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Henzel Cristian Alright, I will

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-15 Thread Henzel Cristian
Hello, so I have written an E-Mail to the original maintainer of parcellite more than 2 days ago and haven't got any answer yet. Should I still wait for an answer, or is anyone else interested in uploading this package? -- Best regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Cristian Henzel -- To

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-15 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-11-15 10:13, Henzel Cristian wrote: Hello, Hi so I have written an E-Mail to the original maintainer of parcellite more than 2 days ago and haven't got any answer yet. Should I still wait for an answer, or is anyone else interested

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipit were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). but this last one is unnecessary, because my program actually uses

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, thanks for your reply! I have also tried removing the reference to pthread.h in my program, hoping that it would take the symbols from libc, but I still got the same warning from dpkg-shlibdeps. So, should I put the reference to pthread back in and leave it like that (with the warning)

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: thanks for your reply! I have also tried removing the reference to pthread.h in my program, hoping that it would take the symbols from libc, but I still got the same warning from dpkg-shlibdeps. So, should I put the reference to pthread back in

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16:08AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipit were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). but

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, I have updated the package now and removed all of the references to pthread.h, but it still includes it, and I have no idea why (any help on this would be appreciated). P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed...

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed... Maybe -Wl,--as-needed is not smart enough to cover this case. Entirely dropping the -lpthread is the only way to fix this

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, well, I'm not sure how I could drop -lpthread. Like I said, there is no reference to the pthread lib in any of my source files (beside the obvious call to pthread_exit), so this must come from some of the stuff that ./configure runs, and I am not sure how I could drop it from there. If

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Julien Valroff
Le vendredi 12 nov. 2010 à 13:48:01 (+0100), Raphael Hertzog a écrit : Hi, On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no referece to it and I also use -Wl,--as-needed... Maybe -Wl,--as-needed is not smart enough to cover

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-11-12 13:51, Julien Valroff wrote: Le vendredi 12 nov. 2010 à 13:48:01 (+0100), Raphael Hertzog a écrit : Hi, On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: P.S. I find it odd that it includes the package even if there's no referece to it

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: If it's a harmless warning and the rest of it is fine, could it get in the repos like this? Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not bugs but things that can be

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not bugs but things that can be improved. ok, so is there anything else that I need to do, or will you upload it? I have searched a bit on google, but I couldn't find any

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Cristian Henzel wrote: Sure, this warning is not a reason to block an upload. Many packages in the archive have this kind of warnings. They are not bugs but things that can be improved. ok, so is there anything else that I need to do, or will you upload it? I

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
I responded on a specific point (which concerns me since I'm maintaining dpkg-shlibdeps), I have not looked the rest of the package and I don't intend to do it, sorry. Someone else should be sponsoring it. Ohh, ok then, I got you wrong. Sorry about that. :-) I'm still figuring out how all

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-11-12 18:32, Cristian Henzel wrote: I responded on a specific point (which concerns me since I'm maintaining dpkg-shlibdeps), I have not looked the rest of the package and I don't intend to do it, sorry. Someone else should be

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-12 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, Anyhow, I had yet another look at your package; the copyright file does not Xyhthyx as the copyright holder of a lot of files. Even if he/she stopped developing on the project and you forked it, the original code is still (also) copyrighted by Xyhthyx. I have fixed this in the

RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Cristian Henzel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit. * Package name: clipit Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel o...@web-tm.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/ * License : GPLv3 Section : misc It builds

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Cristian, Cristian Henzel wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit. * Package name: clipit Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel o...@web-tm.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/ * License

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Hi, El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 10:45 +0200, en/na Cristian Henzel va escriure: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit. * Package name: clipit Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel o...@web-tm.com * URL :

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Ooops! El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 11:02 +0100, en/na Benoît Knecht va escriure: Hi Cristian, Cristian Henzel wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit. * Package name: clipit Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
HI! Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda: * Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.1) You should change this version in debian/control file I think you mean the right thing, but for the sake of clarity: One should not only bump the

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 12:52 +0100, en/na Alexander Reichle-Schmehl va escriure: HI! Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda: * Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.1) You should change this version in debian/control file

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, I have managed to fix almost all of the problems, beside two. The first one being the dpkg-shlibdeps warnings. I cannot figure out where they come from. When I created the control file, I have only put as dependency the following things: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~),

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Benoît Knecht
Cristian Henzel wrote: I have managed to fix almost all of the problems, beside two. The first one being the dpkg-shlibdeps warnings. I cannot figure out where they come from. When I created the control file, I have only put as dependency the following things: Build-Depends: debhelper (=

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Benoît Knecht
Benoît Knecht wrote: Cristian Henzel wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package clipit. * Package name: clipit Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Cristian Henzel o...@web-tm.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/ * License

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Cristian Henzel
Sorry, sending the message again because I forgot to cc debian-ment...@lists.debian.org. Hello, I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by overriding dh_clean like this: override_dh_clean:

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi again, Cristian Henzel wrote: I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by overriding dh_clean like this: override_dh_clean: dh_clean ./autogen.sh You should override

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
Hello, On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:44:47PM +0100, Benoît Knecht wrote: Hi again, Cristian Henzel wrote: I have managed to get rid of the dpkg-shlibdeps warning by using the flag '-Wl,--as-needed'. I have also solved the autogen.sh problem by overriding dh_clean like this:

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote on 2010-11-11 20:44: [...] The only problems (at least as far as I can tell) left right now are that autogen.sh asks for user input when running (this is because of gettext) This is indeed an issue, the build process should not require user

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Cristian Henzel
Hello, I have moved the autogen.sh call before dh_auto_configure and have also managed to fix the gettext problem by replacing the gettext command with autopoint. autopoint does basically the same thing as gettext, but without that naging user input request. I haven't made these changes upstream