Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! As you might have noticed, I've just uploaded the package. Regards Christoph -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ s

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-02 Thread Geza Kovacs
On 04/02/2010 05:42 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: >> I've added descriptions to the patches, as recommended by DEP-3. I'm not >> forwarding the patches upstream, as they mostly relate to >> debian-specific quirks and are not generally useful (specifically, one >> deals with Node.js being installed to

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-02 Thread Christoph Egger
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:56:58PM -0400, Geza Kovacs wrote: > On 04/01/2010 12:42 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > * Your patches don't have any description on them. I've missed such > >information quite often when adopting some package (there's some > >DEP for a uniform format somewhere

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-01 Thread Geza Kovacs
On 04/01/2010 12:42 PM, Christoph Egger wrote: > * Could you maybe merge the changelog entries into a single one? >There's no reason to increase the debian revision for every >bullet-point ;) Done, I've merged the changelogs and am now back at 0.5.6-1 > * You're using format '3.0 (quilt

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Christoph Egger (01/04/2010): > Do you think it's sensible to have that packaged in debian (and > it's stable releases)? That's a question (but the other one can be replied to with a dummy RC bug prevening migration until it's in shape for a stable release, should the instability be only te

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-01 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:15:15AM -0400, Geza Kovacs wrote: > On 04/01/2010 06:03 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: > > Quoting Upstream Website: > > > >> Disclaimer: CoffeeScript is just for fun. Until it reaches 1.0, > >> there are no guarantees that the syntax won't change between > >> versions.

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-01 Thread Geza Kovacs
On 04/01/2010 06:03 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: > Quoting Upstream Website: > >> Disclaimer: CoffeeScript is just for fun. Until it reaches 1.0, >> there are no guarantees that the syntax won't change between >> versions. That said, it compiles into clean JavaScript (the good >> parts) that can use

Re: RFS: coffeescript

2010-04-01 Thread Christoph Egger
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Geza Kovacs wrote: > (Please CC any replies to me) > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coffeescript". > > It builds these binary packages: > coffeescript - interpreter and compiler for the CoffeeScript language > coffeescript

RFS: coffeescript

2010-03-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
(Please CC any replies to me) Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coffeescript". * Package name: coffeescript Version : 0.5.6-6 Upstream Author : Jeremy Ashkenas * URL : http://coffeescript.org * License : MIT Section : devel I