Bug#718792: marked as done (RFS: fio 2.11)

2013-12-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 22:04:25 +0100 with message-id <20131228210425.gf3...@garkbit.lan> and subject line Re: bug 718792 (sponsorship-request on fio) still open? has caused the Debian Bug report #718792, regarding RFS: fio 2.11 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:40:03AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > Upstream maintainer Jens Axboe told me that he likely releases a fio 2.12 > this week, which has some patches merged I currently carry in the package. > > I suggest that I remove the compression setting then and do anothe

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-06 Thread Martin Steigerwald
- Ursprüngliche Mail - > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi, > > > Okay, should be fine to go now: > > I'm in general fine with the package. > None the less a remark to maybe think about: > > a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? > b) I

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-06 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! - Ursprüngliche Mail - > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:52:47PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? > > b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9? > > > > For

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:52:47PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? > b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9? > > For a) I think maybe for b) I guess buildd maintain

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > Okay, should be fine to go now: I'm in general fine with the package. None the less a remark to maybe think about: a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9?

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
- Ursprüngliche Mail - > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fio": > > Oh, please hold back until further notice: I missed > > /usr/bin/

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > > Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fio": Oh, please hold back until further notice: I missed /usr/bin/fio_generate_plots: -: not found http://bugs.debian.org

RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fio": * Package name: fio Version : 2.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Jens Axboe * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/fio * License :