Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 673223 RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Bug #673223 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-2 -- administration tool
for kernel IP sets
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for kernel
Hi,
Bart noticed, you uploaded a new version to Mentors. Should it be uploaded?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
Bart noticed, you uploaded a new version to Mentors. Should it be uploaded?
I think it's in the Wheezy freeze and the package is not the fixing
important bugs, therefore, I have not requested for sponsor yet.
My intention is
On 26.09.2012 01:59, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
My intention is waiting until the Wheezy released, but is it OK if it be
uploaded to 'experimental' first ?
You're the boss. :
(as I said last time, you can also contact me directly, if you want to
get something sponsored. You do not need to file a
On 26.09.2012 01:59, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
My intention is waiting until the Wheezy released, but is it OK if it be
uploaded to 'experimental' first ?
You're the boss. :
(as I said last time, you can also contact me directly, if you want to
get something sponsored. You do not need to file a
Your message dated Wed, 26 Sep 2012 05:02:47 +
with message-id 20120926050247.ga1...@master.debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#673223: RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for
kernel IP sets
has caused the Debian Bug report #673223,
regarding RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool
Hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
* Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system?
iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
The ipset depends on libmnl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.12.1-2
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu
* URL : http://ipset.netfilter.org/
* License
Hi Arno,
On 15 May 2012 08:51, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
* You declare the debhelper compat[ibility] to be 9, but you build
depend on debhelper (= 9). Please use a version which actually
supports the finalized level 9. That is 9.20120115.
No need to impose this requirement because
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 14:08:46 +0200
with message-id 4fb2474e.70...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#672394: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for
kernel IP sets
has caused the Debian Bug report #672394,
regarding RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP
On Tue, 15 May 2012, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
* Are you sure about the location of the binary in the file system?
iptables is in /sbin, why do you install ipset to /usr/sbin?
The ipset depends on libmnl which it is installed in /usr/lib or
/usr/lib/[arch triplet] if it willing support
tags 672394 + moreinfo
owner 672394 !
thanks
Hi Neutrom,
this is a review of your package ipset.
* Do not set DM-Upload-Allowed: yes on your own. It's your sponsor's
domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
scare off even more potential sponsors by adding DMUA for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 672394 + moreinfo
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
for kernel IP sets
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
owner 672394 !
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51:40AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
this is a review of your package ipset.
* Do not set DM-Upload-Allowed: yes on your own. It's your sponsor's
domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
scare off even more potential sponsors by adding
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #672394
Dckage: sponsorship-requests
Version: RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.12.1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 672394 RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for
kernel IP sets
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #672394
Dear mentors,
As the upstream releases the new version 6.12.1 of ipset for the
build system bug fix that including my proposed patch.
Therefore, I'm working on this and will upload the new updated package
soon.
Best regards,
Neutron
Package: sponsorship-requests
Version: RFS: ipset/6.12-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.12-1
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:07:52 +0100
with message-id 87zkbh8yyf@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: RFS: ipset/6.11-2 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
has caused the Debian Bug report #661568,
regarding RFS: ipset/6.11-2 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
Hi,
Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com writes:
* Close bugs that have been reintroduced again since updating version
uploaded. (Closes: #528990,#625360,#648366)
Please close bugs that are fixed by other means than changes in the
package by sending a mail to the BTS (ideally with
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com writes:
* Close bugs that have been reintroduced again since updating version
uploaded. (Closes: #528990,#625360,#648366)
Please close bugs that are fixed by
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 05:34 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
You effort is appreciated but ipset already provided by xtables-addons.
http://xtables-addons.sourceforge.net/
xtables-addons is already in debian, if need ipset compatible with recent
linux kernels.
I think that since ipset is now
Hi Nikolai,
Basically what you're talking about is just happened - some hours ago 'ipset'
was accepted to unstable, see
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ipset.html
When credits for preparing standalone 'ipset' package goes to Neutron Soutmun,
yours truly played a key role in coordinating
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.11-2
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu
* URL : http://ipset.netfilter.org/
* License :
Hi Neutron,
Just one little suggestion if you excuse me:
Could you please put a short description of bugs you're closing to changelog?
This would be very helpful.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 14:28:25 Neutron Soutmun wrote:
* Close bugs that have been reintroduced again since
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi Neutron,
Just one little suggestion if you excuse me:
Could you please put a short description of bugs you're closing to changelog?
This would be very helpful.
Updated.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Best
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable
release's kernel?
I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones
which
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
I guess the major issue at this point would be the kernel that will ship
with the next release, if it is set to be a 3.0 or newer kernel then it
shouldn't be an issue (similar to things like iptables itself or tools
like vlan).
For the next Debian
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
I guess the major issue at this point would be the kernel that will ship
with the next release, if it is set to be a 3.0 or newer kernel then it
shouldn't be an issue
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable
release's kernel?
I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones
which can be considered as peers to Debian in terms of importance,
Greetings,
Wish I'd seen this thread earlier, would have saved me a heap of
time/work I've been putting into packaging ipset myself.
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 10:57 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
I have not followed all the discussion, but indeed the ipset modules
will cause a conflict now they
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Nikolai Lusan niko...@lusan.id.au wrote:
Greetings,
Wish I'd seen this thread earlier, would have saved me a heap of
time/work I've been putting into packaging ipset myself.
:)
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 10:57 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
I have not followed
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 10:14 +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Nikolai Lusan niko...@lusan.id.au wrote:
I have a set of rules and files for bulding a dkms package, I simply
made it require linux-image = 2.6.35. You have to account for people
not using distro
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:31:01PM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
I must apologize you, Pierre but I have to CC you because we need your
suggestions.
[...]
IMO, if the next release (1.41) of xtables-addons will not build
ipset, so, ipset package should set the Conflicts to only for
Is there any plan to fix #651790 ?
This way, xtables-addons can also remove the Conflicts with ipset, and
ipset can also Conflicts with xtables-addons ( 1.4x)
This bug also fixed, the ipset package is build only the userland
utility and no needs to build against any recent kernel which the
I must apologize you, Pierre but I have to CC you because we need your
suggestions.
I reckon you're aware that your package conflicts with
xtables-addons-common?
At this time, my ipset binary still conflicts as the
xtables-addons-common also provides the binary in the same path.
My
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
I reckon you're aware that your package conflicts with
xtables-addons-common?
At this time, my ipset binary still conflicts as the
xtables-addons-common also provides the binary in the same path.
My concern is that overlapping is a big
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
I reckon you're aware that your package conflicts with
xtables-addons-common?
At this time, my ipset binary still conflicts as the
xtables-addons-common also
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset.
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.11-1
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu
* URL : http://ipset.netfilter.org/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds
Hi Neutron,
You effort is appreciated but ipset already provided by xtables-addons.
http://xtables-addons.sourceforge.net/
xtables-addons is already in debian, if need ipset compatible with recent
linux kernels.
Regards,
Dmitry.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:18:29 Neutron Soutmun wrote:
Dear
xtables-addons is already in debian, if need ipset compatible with recent
linux kernels.
Yes, I'm using xtables-addons until now and I learn to package from your work :)
But found this commit:
Yes, I'm using xtables-addons until now and I learn to package from your
work :) But found this commit:
Thank you for kind words. :) A real pleasure.
build: deactivate build of ipset-genl by default
== 8 ==
Changes:
+- Deactivate build of ipset-genl by default.
+ I think the original
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Yes, I'm using xtables-addons until now and I learn to package from your
work :) But found this commit:
Thank you for kind words. :) A real pleasure.
:) For the whole day, I try to build ipset-source, ipset-dkms
Hi Neutron,
Is ipset6 means ipset for IPv6 ? or ipset (6.x) ?
I'm interested in the IPv6 with ipset but not tested yet. The IPv6 is
not widely used in Thailand yet.
I meant ipset v6.* as this is the only one which works with up-to-date
kernels. (I didn't try it with IPv6)
I reckon
44 matches
Mail list logo
