Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-04-07 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Dear readers, it took some time to process the hints. Nevertheless I fixed the most of the mentioned errors. There are three errors left, related to symbol files. As I understood the documentation, the symbol file should list all symbols, provided by the current binary packages. Therefore I

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. ok, agree, my typo. But I think it

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:56:11AM +0100, Helmut Grohne a écrit : On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/2/25 Joachim Langenbach joachim.langenb...@engsas.de: Without the dependencies to binary packages defined in this package (like dependency of libengsas0-common from libengsas0), right? I think libengsas0-common should be kept. Also, probably 0 should be removed from its name:

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, On 02/25/2013 07:52 AM, Joachim Langenbach wrote: 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to stable release. It is impossible. Use unstable instead. Also you should put your name there. So this stable or unstable line refers to the distribution status the package is

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Anton Gladky
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: Hello, 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. Hello, ok, agree, my typo. But I think it is desirable to ask for DEP-5 for new

RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Dear debian developers, I'm looking for a sponsor for my libengsas packages. It is a Qt based library, which main goal is to provide platform independend and common API for using KDE libs or Qt only. For example it provides a QFileDialog replacement, which uses the KFileDialog when KDE is

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Joachim, thanks for trying to bring a new software into Debian. A couple of notes/questions about your package: 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to stable release. It is impossible. Use unstable instead. Also you should put your name there. 2) compat-level 7 is

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Hi Anton, thanks for your review. Since I did not understand the reason for some of them, I have some questions. 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to stable release. It is impossible. Use unstable instead. Also you should put your name there. So this stable or unstable