Andreas Moog am...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Andreas Moogam...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support.
On 07/12/2011 03:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Anyway, I looked into unstable and patched /usr/lib/libxmlsec1*.la
temporarily, which means clearing dependency_libs.
Unfortunately, this doesn't help. Libtool (ld) still links libgeier
against all the (unnecessary) libs as before. dpkg-shlibdeps
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Not really:
I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
W: libgeier source:
Uwe Kleine-König uklei...@strlen.de writes:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
P: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
P: libgeier0: no-upstream-changelog
Doesn't make sense, since upstream changelog is empty.
So overwrite it.
I don't understand that. What
Olaf Dietsche olaf--mail.debian-ment...@olafdietsche.de wrote on
2011-07-11 20:17:
So overwrite it.
I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
and a file
On 07/11/2011 09:12 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
So overwrite it.
I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it?
You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line:
libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog
and a file debian/libgeier0.lintian-overrides with the
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andreas Moog wrote:
Is it really considered necessary to override a wishlist/--pedantic
lintian tag?
Definitely not.
It also is not correct to override lintian when it is correct.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Andreas Moog am...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt (which is linked from
On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Andreas Moogam...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support. According to
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Not really:
I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:53 +0200, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
So, where do these other warnings come from?
From my bash configuration:
alias lintian='lintian --info --display-info --display-experimental --pedantic
--show-overrides --checksums --color auto'
And always use the latest lintian from
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Not really:
I: libgeier source: missing-debian-source-format
W: libgeier source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
W: libgeier source:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12-0.1
of my package libgeier.
It builds these binary packages:
libgeier-dev - Development files for the libgeier library
libgeier0 - Elster client library (German tax declarations)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
