On 02/02/2012 11:08 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-02-01, 18:51:
>>> What does "+testing.1" mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is
>>> the case, then use "~" instead of "+".
>> Yes , it is pre-release version .
>> The upstream had "-testting.1" in his version and I had to
* Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-02-01, 18:51:
What does "+testing.1" mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is
the case, then use "~" instead of "+".
Yes , it is pre-release version .
The upstream had "-testting.1" in his version and I had to change this
to meet the upstream_version requirements
On 02/01/2012 12:42 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-28, 12:09:
> I also modified changelog such a way that line "debian/control
> added DM-Upload-Allowed" appears in the correct section , but I
> have some doubts if it is ok to edit old changelog sections .
Th
* Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-28, 12:09:
I also modified changelog such a way that line "debian/control added
DM-Upload-Allowed" appears in the correct section , but I have some
doubts if it is ok to edit old changelog sections .
That's fine with me.
But please don't change timestamp for the
On 01/21/2012 03:02 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
On 01/20/2012 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Alex Mestiashvili, 2012-01-16, 20:16:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but
0.4.2-1 had alr
On 01/20/2012 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 20:16:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
>>> The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but
>>> 0.4.2-1 had already this field.
>>>
>>> What do y
* Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 20:16:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but
0.4.2-1 had already this field.
What do you mean by "other architectures" (in the patch header)?
Hi Jaku
On 01/16/2012 07:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 19:21:
>> Dear mentors ,
>> could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug
>> #655119
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
>>
>
> The changelog says
* Alex Mestiashvili , 2012-01-16, 19:21:
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
The changelog says "debian/control added DM-Upload-Allowed", but 0.4.2-1
had a
Dear mentors ,
could you please sponsor my package libpam-abl which fixes FTBFS bug #655119
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc
Thank you ,
Alex
On 05/07/2011 04:59 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> Package name: libpam-abl
> License : GPL
On 07/30/2011 12:51 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Alex,
[...]
Instead of setting an override, you can probably patch the
manpages. This could also be related to a docbook bug.
[...]
I've uploaded a new version with mentioned fixes .
I didn't touch overrides becau
Hi Alex,
[...]
> >
> > Instead of setting an override, you can probably patch the
> > manpages. This could also be related to a docbook bug.
> >
[...]
>
> I've uploaded a new version with mentioned fixes .
> I didn't touch overrides because don't know how to fix these
> warnings , also I
On 06/28/2011 02:12 PM, Etienne Millon wrote:
Hello,
I had a look at your package. Please not that I am not a DD, and so I
can't sponsor your contribution.
Build
-
Your package builds in a clean sid chroot.
Lintian
---
Your package is _not_ lintian clean. Here are the warnings upto -
On 06/28/2011 02:12 PM, Etienne Millon wrote:
Hello,
I had a look at your package. Please not that I am not a DD, and so I
can't sponsor your contribution.
Build
-
Your package builds in a clean sid chroot.
Lintian
---
Your package is _not_ lintian clean. Here are the warnings upto -
Hello,
I had a look at your package. Please not that I am not a DD, and so I
can't sponsor your contribution.
Build
-
Your package builds in a clean sid chroot.
Lintian
---
Your package is _not_ lintian clean. Here are the warnings upto -E:
- I: libpam-abl source: binary-control-fie
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-abl".
* Package name: libpam-abl
Version : 0.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Chris Tasma , Andy Armstrong
* URL : http://pam-abl.deksai.com/
* License : GPL2
Section : admin
It builds these bina
Package name: libpam-abl
License : GPL 2
Description : pam_abl blocks hosts which are attempting a brute
force attack.
pam_abl is able to protect any service which uses it for authentication.
It works on the assumption that an attacker won't get the password right
without a lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I just (err, over the last 4 or 5 days) created a (hopefully
standards-compliant) package for the pam_abl PAM module.
The pam_abl module provides a fully configurable way to automatically
blacklist users and/or hosts with many login failures w
18 matches
Mail list logo
