RFS: lisaac (updated package)

2008-02-10 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor and feedback for the new version 1:0.13-1 of my package lisaac. It builds these binary packages: lisaac - Object-oriented language base on prototype lisaac-common - Arch-independent part for lisaac lisaac-doc - Documentation for lisaac lisaac-mode -

Re: RFS: lisaac (updated)

2006-10-05 Thread picca
Hello I will upload the new package tonight. Done can you check the new lisaac package Thanks. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: lisaac (updated)

2006-10-04 Thread Nacho Barrientos Arias
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:55:10 +0200 PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package: Just a few easy-to-fix questions/comments/notes: * Short description field format is (Policy: 5.6.13): Description: single line synopsis

Re: RFS: lisaac (updated)

2006-10-04 Thread picca
Hello I made the changes you ask for. * Short description field format is (Policy: 5.6.13): Description: single line synopsis ok and you wrote: Description:object-oriented language base on prototype Please, be careful with this space. * Doesn't lisaac build with

RFS: lisaac (updated)

2006-10-03 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Hello I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package: * I removed the unwnated files. * modify debian/rules to remove unnecessary lines * reformat the package description * rearrange the copyright file The upload would fix these bugs: 379054 The package can be found on

Re: RFS: lisaac (updated package)

2006-09-18 Thread James Westby
On (17/09/06 21:27), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac Hi, a few more comments for you, * What is #CONFIGURE-STAMP# in debian/rules? * You have a file debian/patch-stamp in the source package. This

RE : RE : RFS: lisaac

2006-09-14 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
On (13/09/06 21:59), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: * I'm a little wary of the copyright situation, as I can't see any statements within the package. It appears the license is DFSG free, but you need to include any and all copyright statements in your debian/copyright. If

RFS: lisaac

2006-09-13 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-13 Thread James Westby
On (13/09/06 14:27), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac I'm afraid I can't sponsor the package, but I have some comments for you. * The descriptions for the -common and -doc packages should at least

Re: RE : RFS: lisaac

2006-09-13 Thread James Westby
[Moving back on list, as I would like to keep it there, and I don't think the information is private] On (13/09/06 21:59), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: * I'm a little wary of the copyright situation, as I can't see any statements within the package. It appears the license is DFSG free,

RE : RE : RFS: lisaac

2006-09-13 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
. I realise you did that, however I am not talking about the license, I am referring to Copyright statements, e.g. Copyright 2006 James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] They are a separate issue from licenses, as they state who has the Copyright for the work. Licenses deal with what you as a

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-08 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Hello I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package: * Now it is lintian clean. I added some overrides for the GPL du to the reference in the CeCillv2 licence. *I removed all un commented dh_* in the rules file. *My email is the same everywhere. *I am using dpatch for path.li The

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-07 Thread picca
Hello * lintian errors: E: lisaac-doc: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl E: lisaac-common: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl E: lisaac: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl For thoses errors. In fact the text of the Cecillv2 licence

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-07 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 07 September 2006 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Hello, * lintian errors: E: lisaac-doc: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl E: lisaac-common: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl E: lisaac:

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-07 Thread picca
True. Have a look at how to deal with lintian's overrides: file:/usr/share/doc/lintian/lintian.html/ch2.html#s2.4 (tip: you want to override 3 binary type packages) I will check this thanks. As long as you are reachible via these addresses it is not a big deal. Of course it would be nice

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-06 Thread picca
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:32:21 +0200 Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Frédéric, I'm not a DD (so I can't upload, and for sure I'll miss some notes), but I gave a look at your package and found some issues: * lintian errors: E: lisaac-doc:

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:24:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : do you have a documentation explaining how to set up a patch-system like dpatch Dear Frédéric, I wrote the following paragraphs in a never released web page:

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-09-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Frédéric, I'm not a DD (so I can't upload, and for sure I'll miss some notes), but I gave a look at your package and found some issues: * lintian errors: E: lisaac-doc: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl E: lisaac-common:

RFS: lisaac

2006-09-03 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)

RFS: lisaac

2006-08-18 Thread picca
RFS: lisaac Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac, Or at least an opinion about the packaging. Thank you. * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-08-18 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 18 August 2006 12:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RFS: lisaac Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac, Or at least an opinion about the packaging. Thank you. CeCILL FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE looks free to me, but you must include its full text in debian/copyright

Re: RFS: lisaac

2006-08-18 Thread picca
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:11:42 +0300 George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 18 August 2006 12:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RFS: lisaac Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac, Or at least an opinion about the packaging. Thank you. CeCILL FREE

RFS: lisaac

2006-07-24 Thread picca
---BeginMessage--- Title: RFS: lisaac Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name : lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL) http://www.cecill.info

RFS: lisaac

2006-06-24 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : Benoit Sonntag * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 Section : devel It builds these binary packages: