Le jeudi 31 décembre 2009 à 03:44 +0100, sils a écrit :
On my actually status, i just want to do things as better, step by step,
i am not actually the official maintainer since it will be upload the
newest package, because of that reason I don't want to send nothing to
bts to prevent
Thanks Olivier,
Nice to read you again :-)
Olivier Berger wrote:
Le jeudi 31 décembre 2009 à 03:44 +0100, sils a écrit :
On my actually status, i just want to do things as better, step by step,
i am not actually the official maintainer since it will be upload the
newest package, because of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.8+dfsg-4
of my package mantis.
It builds these binary packages:
mantis - web-based bug tracking system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 471094, 542760, 545406, 545732
Please, consider
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:04 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
Please, consider that remaining bugs (#555264,#555265), not afecting
mantis, will be closed manually after this package reach the archive and
i'll be grabbed as new maintainer.
These look like valid bugs to me, why would
Hi Paul,
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
since version 1.1.2+dfsg-1 (see changelog for more info [0]).
Same thing applies to
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
since version
Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
sils s...@powered-by-linux.com writes:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis,
because prototype.js file is
Hi Ben,
I appreciate your comments, but i think there's a little mix-up with
this thread. I'm sure it was my fault, let me explain ..
I uploaded a new package release of mantis to mentors to be sponsored. I
adopted this package but everything was in the wrong way, then i tried
to arrange things
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 07:32, schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a (one-time) sponsor for the new version 1.0.8-1
of my package mantis, as it seems that the person who sponsors my
uploads normally is not available.
Hi Patrick,
Thanks, I've uploaded it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a (one-time) sponsor for the new version 1.0.8-1
of my package mantis, as it seems that the person who sponsors my
uploads normally is not available.
It builds these binary packages:
mantis - web-based bug tracking
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 04:12, Kevin Coyner wrote:
I believe I've prepared this appropriately. In debian/changelog I
set urgency to 'high'. I know this will get it into unstable on an
expedited basis, but am unsure how to get the fix into stable.
It looks good, I've uploaded your
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.73-4 of my package
libphp-phpmailer. My normal sponsor for this package seems
unavailable presently and this upload is rather important in that it
fixes a security hole. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429179 regarding
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:12:47PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.73-4 of my package
libphp-phpmailer. My normal sponsor for this package seems
unavailable presently and this upload is rather important in that it
fixes a security hole. See
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote..
I believe I've prepared this appropriately. In debian/changelog
I set urgency to 'high'. I know this will get it into unstable
on an expedited basis, but am unsure how to get the fix into
stable.
You meant: testing,
Good Morning Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz
the patches need to be -p1, not -p0. that's all :)
well that did what it should did. Another problem:
You mentioned that it does not make much sense
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
You mentioned that it does not make much sense to use a patch system and
modifying checkin.php directly. Normally, i agree, but then i will have
to add a lintian override to my package, because to remove the change
and instead add it as a patch does lead into an
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
You mentioned that it does not make much sense to use a patch system and
modifying checkin.php directly. Normally, i agree, but then i will have
to add a lintian override to my package, because to remove the change
and instead add it as a patch
Hi
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:59:06 +0100
Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
Upstream URL: http://www.mantisbt.org
---snap---
should be this:
---snip---
Homepage: http://www.matisbt.org
---snap---
More important is that it should point to
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote:
More important is that it should point to
http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/
why this? It seems as it would make no difference.
Greets
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Daniel,
i have just finished my work on the package. My changes are:
* the ones you mentioned - everything should be okay now
* (re)added a debian/po directory and template files for translators
* Changed Upstream URL to mantisbugtracking.com as Michael told me
Incoming queue of m.d.o is
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:46:44 +0100
Patrick Schönfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote:
More important is that it should point to
http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/
why this? It seems as it would make no difference.
See http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/index.php?f_offset=18
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
* the ones you mentioned - everything should be okay now
no, not all:
* this:
---snip---
Upstream URL: http://www.mantisbugtracker.com
---snap---
should be this:
---snip---
Homepage: http://www.mantisbugtracker.com
---snap---
* debian/copyright is
Hi Thijs,
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
[...]
Good to see that Mantis is getting a new maintainer.
:-)
Please note that there have been numerous security issues with Mantis in the
recent past.
Yes i know that mantis has a bad security history. Anyway i prefer to
stay on mantis instead of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
no, not all:
* this:
[...]
should be this:
[...]
oops, you got me! :-) Corrected.
* debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright
holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and
Hi,
* debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright
holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and phpmailer is missing (and
likely also others, stopped after finding these two).
Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules don't install
them, as i
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules don't install
them, as i patched the sources (with patch 01 and 02) to use the debian
packages of them instead. I just did not want to change the orig tarball
for this.
as we are also distributing the source,
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
as we are also distributing the source, not just the binaries,
you have to:
* either write a complete debian/copyright file covering all code
shipped within the sources.
Daniel, Thijs: thanks for clarification in this point.
I have now uploaded another
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
Hi,
* debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright
holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and phpmailer is missing (and
likely also others, stopped after finding these two).
Hmm. Do i really need to do this? Because my debian/rules
Sorry! I made a mistake, when sending out this mail. There has been an
error, while updating the packages on my server. It is *now* updated.
I'm really sorry for wasting your time :-(
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
as we are also distributing the source, not just the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6-1 of the
package mantis. Package is orphaned, i am the adopter of this package.
It builds these arch-independent packages:
mantis - web-based bug tracking system
The package is
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
you're using patches, nevertheless you're modifying core/checkin.php, is
this intentional?
* NEWS: don't use two (or more) empty lines as seperator, one
is just enough.
* README.LDAP: remove the
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your quick response. Most of the things i will change until
tomorrow, but there are a few questions/comments.
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
* if you're including the dpatch.make in
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
For some reason this failed in this package ago for one of the patches,
which was stated not to be found. Well, I've changed much since then,
maybe it will work as supposed now.
try it, if it doesn't work out, i'll help.
It does provide the -patch/-unpatch arguments
Hi there,
i have removed the targets from the makefile and instead added a line:
include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
Also i modified (one of) the patches in this kind:
1. Remove the inclusion of DPATCH and the exit line
2. Changed shebang to run /bin/sh with /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
Well now it does not run. Instead it says:
can i see your sources?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
Well now it does not run. Instead it says:
can i see your sources?
Here you are:
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hello Patrick,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.6-1 of the
package mantis. Package is orphaned, i am the adopter of this package.
It builds these arch-independent packages:
mantis - web-based bug tracking system
Good to see that Mantis is getting a new maintainer.
schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz
the patches need to be -p1, not -p0. that's all :)
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
39 matches
Mail list logo
