Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2012-05-14 Thread Damien Leone
Hi Benoît, Thanks for your review. Comments below: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.orgwrote: - In debian/changelog, you mention updating the standards version, but not the changes required; if there wasn't any, you should mention that in the

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2012-05-13 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Damien, Damien Leone wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.10 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.5.6). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean.

RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2012-05-12 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.10 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.5.6). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix bugs

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2011-01-17 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, Any reviewer please? -- Damien Leone

RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2011-01-07 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.5.5). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix this bug:

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-12-09 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, Thanks for reviewing. Excerpts from Kan-Ru Chen's message of jeu. déc. 09 08:19:35 +0100 2010: Why did you remove old changelog entries from debian/changelog? Argh, I didn't notice that, I messed up my debian folder. Fixed. And please document changes to the package other than new

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-12-09 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Damien Leone damien.le...@fensalir.fr writes: Hello, Thanks for reviewing. Excerpts from Kan-Ru Chen's message of jeu. déc. 09 08:19:35 +0100 2010: Why did you remove old changelog entries from debian/changelog? Argh, I didn't notice that, I messed up my debian folder. Fixed. And please

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-12-08 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Damien Leone damien.le...@fensalir.fr writes: Hello, Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.5 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.5.4). Why did you remove old changelog entries from debian/changelog? And please document changes to the package other

RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-12-04 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.5 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.5.4). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix this bug:

RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs:

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: Hello, Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, First, thanks for your review. On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided package is for 0.5.2, the

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: Hello, First, thanks for your review. On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread Damien Leone
Hello, On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) I included a patch to the package. It should be

Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)

2010-03-03 Thread George Danchev
Damien Leone writes: Hello, On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) I included a patch