Bug#1063511: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2~bpo12+1 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:33:15 + (UTC) with message-id <1687483622.1742737.1707730395...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1063511: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2~bpo12+1 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers has caused the Debian Bug report #1

Bug#1063511: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2~bpo12+1 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-skype": * Package name : pidgin-skype Version : 20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2~bpo12+1 Upstream contact : Eion Robb *

Bug#1062812: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Feb 2024 10:10:35 + (UTC) with message-id <1763618665.7635802.1707041435...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1062812: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers has caused the Debian Bug report #1062812, reg

Bug#1062812: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-skype": * Package name : pidgin-skype Version : 20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-2 Upstream contact : Eion Robb * URL

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hello, >It is really random, for upstream modification. > >But it looks I could have to do something for auto-glib2.0 > transition. >Which I don't really understand yet. Just don't do any action should be fine. There is a time_t

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hello, Le 30/01/2024 à 19:20, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : Hello, please switch VCS fields to the new location https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pidgin-skype/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads Done, in both repositories. And then just delete the old repository once the new version

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hello, please switch VCS fields to the new location https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pidgin-skype/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads And then just delete the old repository once the new version is uploaded in sid. There is no rush, if you plan some upload in the near future. G. Il

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hello, On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:36:02 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Happily done, btw how do you feel about pushing your work somewhere in Debian git repositories? > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pidgin-skype might be a good place. > > This way other people can help maintaining your

Bug#1061079: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers)

Your message dated Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:36:02 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS pidgin-skype has caused the Debian Bug report #1061079, regarding RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hi, I changed the version to 20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-1 because the patch I added has been applied upstream and hardening work now. Changelog is the same and this version is uploaded on Mentors. Best regards, -- Patrick ZAJDA OpenPGP_0x9D4AD35BEA273DCA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key

Bug#1061079: RFS pidgin-skype

Hello, I fixed some lintian info and migrated debug symbols to new standard, they are now in pidgin-skybe-common-dbgsym instead of pidgin-skype-dbg Best regards, -- Patrick ZAJDA OpenPGP_0x9D4AD35BEA273DCA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Bug#1061079: RFS: pidgin-skype/20230710+git5daf79d+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers (Pidgin-specific files)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-skype": * Package name : pidgin-skype Version : 20230710+git5daf79d+dfsg-1 Upstream contact : Eion Robb * URL : https://github.com/EionRobb/skype4pidgin * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs :

Bug#694387: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM but packages in NEW])

Your message dated Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:23:33 + with message-id e1urpih-00075z...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM but packages in NEW] has caused the Debian Bug report #694387, regarding RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM

Bug#694387: RFS: pidgin-skype/20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 [DM but packages in NEW]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-skype * Package name: pidgin-skype Version : 20121121+svn646+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Eion Robb eionr...@gmail.com * URL :

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

Mentors, Changes: - from contrib to non-free due to CC-BY-NC-SA PNGs license. - debian/copyright - no more lintian warning (source code format error remains due to lintian bug #552707) Thanks Gabriele http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/pidgin-skype dget

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

Hello mentors, thanks to all for your suggestions. In the version I just duploaded: - tarball contains svn version - debian/copyright is in DEP-5 format - source package format is 3.0 (quilt) (the only lintian error) - PNGs didn't change. I'm trying to contact the icons creator asking him to

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On 2009-11-03, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: It's fairly rare for someone to laboriously create multiple versions of icons at different resolutions in PNG. [I know I certainly haven't done it since about 1992.] Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png and

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Right, the icons are currently non-free, but pngs are also free and licensable under the terms of the GPL, okay it does not make much sense, but yeah.. Source of it? Open it and edit it :) If the images were created directly as a png, yes. if they

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julian Andres Klode schrieb: Am Dienstag, den 03.11.2009, 02:07 +0100 schrieb Gabriele Giacone: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-skype. * Package name: pidgin-skype Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don Armstrong schrieb: On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Right, the icons are currently non-free, but pngs are also free and licensable under the terms of the GPL, okay it does not make much sense, but yeah.. Source of it? Open it and

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Don Armstrong schrieb: If the images were created directly as a png, yes. if they were created as svg or similar and converted to png (more likely), no. More likely? In fact, near absolute certainty: $ dget -qux

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Di, 03 Nov 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: provide assurances that the SVG no longer exists at all. You probably also should be generating the icons on the fly from the SVG using inkscape as you build the package. What??? That is a joke, right? If everyone would start using inkscape for

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 01:15 +, Sune Vuorela wrote: Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png and does pixelmanipulations of each size. What's the source here ? Theoretical discussions aside, in this case, I'd distribute both. If the SVG no longer exists, I'd

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: I would rather stick to the interpretation that the preferred form of modification is the one upstream uses, even if we think this is not optimal and we would prefer he had done another way. The prefered form of modification is the form that is

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: This would mean, that it is created with inkscape, which could also save the files as svg. So the strings and the used software does not realy say, that there is a real source file of it. It doesn't tell you whether the source code exists anymore,

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Mi, 04 Nov 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: I would rather stick to the interpretation that the preferred form of modification is the one upstream uses, even if we think this is not optimal and we would prefer he had done another way. Thanks, yes! BTW; If you use help2man the

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don Armstrong schrieb: In fact, near absolute certainty: $ dget -qux 'http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skype_0.1-1.dsc' $ strings pidgin-skype-0.1/icons/48/skypeout.png IHDR sBIT pHYs tEXtSoftware

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

Le Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:29:00PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : You can deliberately destroy the source code of almost anything that we distribute in Debian. That doesn't change what the source code was. [And honestly, I'm not convinced that such deliberate destruction complies with DFSG

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 18:27 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: * You should probably not depend on pidgin, I guess the plugin is also useable from finch (the console version). You would want to depend on libpurple0, but that should be happening automatically. (I haven't tried building this

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tuesday 03 November 2009 14:06:20 Patrick Matthäi wrote: Don Armstrong schrieb: $ dget -qux 'http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/p/pidgin-skype/pidgin-skyp e_0.1-1.dsc' $ strings pidgin-skype-0.1/icons/48/skypeout.png IHDR sBIT pHYs tEXtSoftware www.inkscape.org

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Norbert Preining wrote: If everyone would start using inkscape for building icons that are pre-made then ... well, build-deps are exploding. I don't particularly care whether they're generated on the fly or not, but in many cases, distributing the svg with (some set) of

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2009-11-03, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: It's fairly rare for someone to laboriously create multiple versions of icons at different resolutions in PNG. [I know I certainly haven't done it since about 1992.] Yes and no. Some icon artists

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 04 Nov 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: I would rather stick to the interpretation that the preferred form of modification is the one upstream uses, even if we think this is not optimal and we would prefer he had done another way. Thanks,

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:29:00PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : You can deliberately destroy the source code of almost anything that we distribute in Debian. That doesn't change what the source code was. [And honestly, I'm not convinced that such

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Norbert Preining wrote: On Di, 03 Nov 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: provide assurances that the SVG no longer exists at all. You probably also should be generating the icons on the fly from the SVG using inkscape as you build the package. What??? That is a joke, right?

Re: RFS: pidgin-skype

In 20091104001114.ga18...@kunpuu.plessy.org, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:29:00PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : You can deliberately destroy the source code of almost anything that we distribute in Debian. That doesn't change what the source code was. [And honestly, I'm not

Archival of source material forwarded upstream (was: Re: RFS: pidgin-skype).

Le Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:26:59PM -0800, Don Armstrong a écrit : In your case, I'd suggest that you should be distributing *both* the docbook form, and the nroff form that upstream is modifying. [Or at the very least, the docbook form should be publicly available, even if it doesn't go in

RFS: pidgin-skype

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-skype". * Package name : pidgin-skype Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Eion Robb eionr...@gmail.com * URL : http://eion.robbmob.com/ * License : GPLv3 Section : contrib/net It builds these binary packages: pidgin-skype -