also sprach Conall O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.01.0739 +0200]:
Good evening to Dublin!
Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~
Then get off your computer, silly! Especially since you're
apparently enjoying yourself so much to the point of drooling from
the tip of
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it
makes no use to include it in
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:23:20 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
keep compatibility for long time. And if tools
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:31:56PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
A more practical reason not to do it is that the homepage may move,
leaving us publishing outdated information for the rest of the stable
release.
An easy and practical solution to that would be to use redirects from
within the
On Friday 01 September 2006 15:31, Sam Morris wrote:
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:23:20 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package queuegraph.
Hi Conall,
also sprach Conall O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]:
queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
The package is lintian clean.
Some more comments:
debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
debian/copyright: you
On Thursday 31 August 2006 11:34, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi Conall,
also sprach Conall O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1003
+0200]:
queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
The package is lintian clean.
Some more comments:
debian/copyright: you don't claim
also sprach George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]:
I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you
claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there
is any standard text wrt to that like:
It was downloaded from ... Upstream Author ...
On 2006-08-31 at 10:34:55 +0200, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Conall O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]:
queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
The package is lintian clean.
Some more comments:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 14:48, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]:
I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you
claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there
is any standard text wrt to
also sprach Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1403 +0200]:
We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
package description in debian/control. This information should be added
at the end of description, using the following format:
.
On 8/31/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
package description in debian/control. This information should be added
at the end of description, using the following format:
.
Homepage:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:33:38 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1403 +0200]:
We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
package description in debian/control. This information should be added
at the end of
also sprach Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1616 +0200]:
This has been discussed before.
Fortunately this is -mentors, so I won't be flamed to death. :)
I personally like the second format much better (and that's why I
don't add the extra space).
I wholeheartedly agree.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:33:56 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1616 +0200]:
The good solution for this would be to prepare the patch for dpkg
that adds Homepage as a field and be done with it... But it seems
nobody
also sprach Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it
makes no use to include it in debian/control. I always wondered
why there is no proper support
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:34:55AM IST, martin f krafft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
Hey Martin,
debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I
was previously pointed to.
debian/copyright: you
Good evening to Dublin!
also sprach Conall O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.31.2214 +0200]:
debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I
was previously pointed to.
It's okay as it is; my bad.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:22:26PM IST, martin f krafft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
Good evening to Dublin!
Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~
Good morning on Limerick however... :)
Maybe consider updating the dh-make package?
Ah ha! My debian/ scripts
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:55:34AM IST, Paul Wise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
There are some more problems with the package:
* you seem to misunderstand postinst - postinst is run when users
*install* the package onto their systems. also, please think
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:49:39AM IST, Paul Wise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. You should assume that people don't
want a CC unless they indicate that they do in some way.
Apologies. That was mutt doing a reply all...
I suggest this in the
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:32:19AM IST, Conall O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
I've rebuild my package now (and it seems to be 3.7.2 complient). I've
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net again. Hopefully the updated packages
will be moved from incoming/ to the pool soon.
Hmmm,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:58 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
I've rebuild my package now (and it seems to be 3.7.2 complient). I've
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net again. Hopefully the updated packages
will be moved from incoming/ to the pool soon.
I tried to do your dget -x test and I'm
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 09:40:03AM IST, Paul Wise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] incoherently babbled:
There is a strange error in your diff.gz:
$ dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/queuegraph/queuegraph_1.1.0-1.dsc
snip
dpkg-source: extracting queuegraph in queuegraph-1.1.0
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. You should assume that people don't
want a CC unless they indicate that they do in some way.
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 22:00 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
dpkg-source: failure: patch gave error exit status 1
Hmmm, I'm not sure how to investigate this. All I did
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:27 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/queuegraph/queuegraph_1.1.0-1.dsc
There is a strange error in your diff.gz:
$ dget -x
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package queuegraph.
28 matches
Mail list logo
