Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-02-11 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:42:57PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Patches look good to me, please forward them. rhinote is not in my areas of interest, so I won't be uploading it, sorry. No need to apologize, you already did

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-02-04 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:42:57PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Patches look good to me, please forward them. rhinote is not in my areas of interest, so I won't be uploading it, sorry. No need to apologize, you already did so much by finding all those issues and reviewing my patches. Thank you

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-02-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: I’ve patched the source quite a bit, and I believe I’ve addressed all of your concerns. I’ve also improved integration with window managers by setting the WM_CLASS, so that pagers and the like show “Rhinote” instead of “Tk” now. ...

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-02-01 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:29:03PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: I will try to conjure a patch addressing all the concerns you raised during the course of the next few days, and I hope you’ll be willing to review it when it’s done to make sure it is suitable for inclusion upstream. As I’ve

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-24 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:47:21AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: I always get curious when people upload with no comments, so here is a review: First of all, thank you for the review. I’m always looking forward to improve my packages, and an in–depth review gives me the chance to do just that. You

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: Yeah, I should probably have mentioned it, but mostly due to the fact that I’ve added Vcs-* fields — or is collab-maint considered special in this regard? Right, collab-maint isn't special here. Do you suggest mentioning the addition

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-23 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Dear mentors, two weeks have passed without any reply, so I won’t feel bad for giving this RFS a little more visibility. The package is pretty straightforward and lintian clean, so I reckon an experienced Debian contributor could review it reasonably quickly. Please give it a go. Thank you.

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-23 Thread David Paleino
Ciao Andrea, On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:36:12 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rhinote. * Package name: rhinote Version : 0.7.4-1 Upstream Author : Marv Boyes greysp...@tuxfamily.org * URL :

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-23 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:54:57PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian! Whoa, looks like I was right: it really was a quick job for a Debian Member ;) Thank you for the upload! -- Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org Resistance is futile, you will be

Re: RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:54:57PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian! Whoa, looks like I was right: it really was a quick job for a Debian Member ;) Thank you for the upload! I always get

RFS: rhinote (new upstream version)

2012-01-10 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rhinote. * Package name: rhinote Version : 0.7.4-1 Upstream Author : Marv Boyes greysp...@tuxfamily.org * URL : http://rhinote.tuxfamily.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : x11 It builds