Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2014 16:33:31 +
with message-id e1wbrtl-0004nr...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: xnoise/0.2.19-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #707595,
regarding RFS: xnoise/0.2.19-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Dear mentors,
I have updated the package to the new upstream release 0.2.19:
New source control file location is:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xnoise/xnoise_0.2.19-1.dsc
(Debian) changes since the last upload:
- Change taginfo dependency name accordingly [1].
-
Hi Mentors,
the next upstream release came quite faster I thought, so I've bumped
the package on mentors to the 0.2.18 release:
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.2.18-1
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/shuerhaaken/xnoise
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xnoise a lightweight and
fast GTK+ media player.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.2.17-1
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens
* URL :
lightweight is spelled incorrectly in the descriptions.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dominique Lasserre
lasserr...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xnoise a lightweight and
fast GTK+ media
Thank you!
I pushed an corrected version to mentors.
What I recognized so far: valac-0.20 isn't packaged in the archive so I
will prepare a update for the Vala compiler before xnoise sponsorship is
possible.
Regards
Dominique
On 09/05/13 18:37, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
lightweight is spelled
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xnoise.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.31
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens shuerhaa...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://www.xnoise-media-player.com/
* License : GPL2+
Section : sound
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xnoise.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.30
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens shuerhaa...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://www.xnoise-media-player.com/
* License : GPL2+
Section : sound
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xnoise.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.29
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens shuerhaa...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://www.xnoise-media-player.com/
* License : GPL+2
Section : sound
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xnoise.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.27-1
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens shuerhaa...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/xnoise/
* License : GPLv2+ (with exception[0] to non-free
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:03:24PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
That's what Suggests/Recommends are made for. E.g. Rhythmbox Recommends
rhythmbox-plugins, quodlibet Suggests quodlibet-plugins... From Policy §7.2
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with
this
Hello Alessandro Ghedini
- you should append something like (plugins) to the short description so
that it does not duplicate the description of the main package.
Done
- the -plugins package right now Depends on various -dev packages. I do not
think they are needed.
Replaced them with
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
- the -plugins package right now Depends on various -dev packages. I do not
think they are needed.
Replaced them with binary packages in the debian/control file
Again, you don't need to manually add libraries to Depends given
Hello Alessandro Ghedini,
I tried to implement all your points. I reuploaded the packages to
debian mentors.
I have some comments to your testings, see below:
+ IMHO the Section should be sound instead of x11.
sound doesn't seem to fit right, because xnoise is a media player
and also does
Le lundi 11 juillet 2011 16:58:17, shuerhaaken a écrit :
Hello Alessandro Ghedini,
I tried to implement all your points. I reuploaded the packages to
debian mentors.
I have some comments to your testings, see below:
+ IMHO the Section should be sound instead of x11.
sound doesn't
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:58:17PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
+ IMHO the Section should be sound instead of x11.
sound doesn't seem to fit right, because xnoise is a media player
and also does video. If you find something more fitting, please
comment.
Duh. Makes sense... Some similar
Hello Alessandro
Duh. Makes sense... Some similar packages (e.g. banshee and amarok) are in
sound, but I can't say what's the best solution.
I'll look around what has been chosen for other media players.
That's what Suggests/Recommends are made for. E.g. Rhythmbox Recommends
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:02:08PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xnoise.
* Package name: xnoise
Version : 0.1.26-1
Upstream Author : Jörn Magens shuerhaa...@googlemail.com
* URL :
Hello Jörn,
I have packaged xnoise without any lintian errors/warnings. Very good
work. Unfortunately I am not a DD. So you must search further for an
sponsor.
One tip: Instead of using in debian/rules:
override_dh_installman:
dh_installman debian/xnoise.1
it is better creating a file
Hello Joachim
Sorry for this. I will try to fix all this stuff as soon as possible.
I ran
lintian --pedantic xnoise_0.1.25-1_source.changes
and it didn't give me errors or warnings for the final version, which I
then uploaded. I must have done something very wrong, but I don't know
yet what it
shuerhaaken shuerhaa...@googlemail.com wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: I am the developer of
this program and I'd like to see it in Debian. In the past I packaged
this only for Ubuntu via ppa, but that is not the way it should go.
Until now I haven't
shuerhaaken shuerhaa...@googlemail.com wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Unfortunately not! Here is my logging (packaging for testing):
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/sVt1potpnA ...
N:
N: Processing changes file xnoise_0.1.25-1_amd64 (version 0.1.25-1) ...
N:
22 matches
Mail list logo
