Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Giulio, On 18 May 2016 at 07:15, Giulio Paci wrote: > One approach that usually fits my needs is the one proposed by Thibaut > Paumard [1], that I am reproposing here with minimal changes: Thanks for sharing this pretty detailed case. As my issue with "pythonpy" was way

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Hi all, On 18/05/2016 11:48, Ben Finney wrote: > On 18/05/2016 10:21, Tiago Ilieve wrote: >> On 17 May 2016 at 21:06, Ben Finney wrote: >>> How many process calls are there? The ideal solution IMO is to: >> Not much of them. In my case, there's just one. I was

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Tiago Ilieve writes: > Thanks for your input. I like your suggestions, as they look pretty > straightforward, but this is how this is being done for other > packages? Differently, depending on the state of upstream. > I was looking at § 9.1.1 File System Structure[1]

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Hi Ben, On 17 May 2016 at 21:06, Ben Finney wrote: > How many process calls are there? The ideal solution IMO is to: Not much of them. In my case, there's just one. I was thinking about a corner case, where there would be multiple process calls, possible making a

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Tiago Ilieve writes: > Hi Mattia, > > (Moving the discussion from BTS to "debian-mentors" mailing list.) > > On 15 May 2016 at 20:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Given that in your case you say the binary is not called by anything > > else than the