Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-07-03 Thread Tony Houghton
On 02/07/15 20:49, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Tony, Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never got back to you with your latest set of questions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies? One disadv

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-07-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Tony, Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never got back to you with your latest set of questions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies? One disadvantage > I can foresee is that this will

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-17 Thread Tony Houghton
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I was expecting the 'Replaces: roxterm-gtk3' in the

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-17 Thread Tony Houghton
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I was expecting the 'Replaces: roxterm-gtk3' in t

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote: > >> If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you >> want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the >> release cycle is better than later, however). I think

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-16 Thread Tony Houghton
On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote: If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the release cycle is better than later, however). I think these changes sound fine in principle, although a debdiff would c

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-15 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Tony Houghton wrote: > On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote: >> >> On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote: >>> >>> roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it) >>> roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries) >>> roxterm-gtk2-d