Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-07-03 Thread Tony Houghton
On 02/07/15 20:49, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Tony, Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never got back to you with your latest set of questions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: That won't cause problems due to the reversed

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-07-02 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Tony, Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never got back to you with your latest set of questions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies? One disadvantage I can foresee is

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-17 Thread Tony Houghton
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I was expecting the 'Replaces:

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-17 Thread Tony Houghton
On 17/06/15 04:56, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: What I found was that if roxterm-gtk3 is installed, but not roxterm (the old virtual package), dist-upgrade doesn't install the new roxterm package. I was expecting the 'Replaces:

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-16 Thread Tony Houghton
On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote: If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the release cycle is better than later, however). I think these changes sound fine in principle, although a debdiff would

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: On 15/06/15 08:19, Vincent Cheng wrote: If these changes are inevitable, it's really up to you as to when you want to make them happen (I'd suggest that doing them early in the release cycle is better than later, however).

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-15 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote: On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote: roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it) roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)