On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes:
> > For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
> > person that was a new library without any application using it,
> > whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
>
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes:
>
>> For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
>> person that was a new library without any application using it,
>> whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
>
> That's interesting, thank
2009/8/19 Peter Pentchev :
> I've had to do this with Perl modules once - I wanted to package
> a particular module, but it had a chain of dependencies that were
> not packaged yet. What I did was file a series of ITP bugs,
> stating my intentions clearly - first for the "target" package,
> sayin
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes:
>
> > For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
> > person that was a new library without any application using it,
> > whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
Sune Vuorela writes:
> For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
> person that was a new library without any application using it,
> whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you propo
5 matches
Mail list logo
