On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:54:52PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> 2. 0.9.1-really-0.7.0-1 -- fugly but will go away once 0.9 stabilizes.
This is ingenious. Thanks for sharing.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:09:10PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> terminology doesn't seem to be affected by any RC bug. What are you
> talking about?
Oh you're right, I messed up - I thought 848370 was severity serious,
but it's only important.
Thanks,
Ross
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:09:10PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:48:58AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > In [1], it says to upload the
> > old version. I'm not clear on what I need to do - should I open
> > an RFS with the old version from snapshot.d.o?
>
> That
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:48:58AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> terminology was affected by the RC bugs flooding issue mentioned in the
> recent email on the Strech freeze status.
terminology doesn't seem to be affected by any RC bug. What are you
talking about?
> In [1], it says to upload
terminology was affected by the RC bugs flooding issue mentioned in the
recent email on the Strech freeze status. In [1], it says to upload the
old version. I'm not clear on what I need to do - should I open
an RFS with the old version from snapshot.d.o?
Thanks,
Ross
[1]:
5 matches
Mail list logo