-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 02:59 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back
now; see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html
for
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can say only for myself,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
starters.
I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs doc is
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:34]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:35]:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can say only for myself,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
starters.
I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs doc is
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:34]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-23 18:35]:
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
cdbs-plug
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
/cdbs-plug
I can
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (renamed it to gcursor.1
though) and hoped that
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:40:23PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one
Am 2004-07-22 23:40:23, schrieb Magnus Therning:
build-stamp: config.status
...
cp debian/gcursor.1 gcursor.1
...
Still no luck though. could someone give some hints on how to get the
man-page to be installed?
Why not use 'dh_installman path/to/manpage' ?
/M
Greetings
Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (renamed
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (renamed it to gcursor.1
though) and hoped that
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:40:23PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one
Am 2004-07-22 23:40:23, schrieb Magnus Therning:
build-stamp: config.status
...
cp debian/gcursor.1 gcursor.1
...
Still no luck though. could someone give some hints on how to get the
man-page to be installed?
Why not use 'dh_installman path/to/manpage' ?
/M
Greetings
Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
/usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (renamed
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
26 matches
Mail list logo
