Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > It isn't, or rather Joey has misunderstood me - he probably knows every > piece of code by heart. Hardly, and obviously not. I'd forgotten about the seen flag cache used in making it easier to do scripts that back up. Besides, it's 30kloc.. ;-) > Seen (after seeing in fact):

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > It isn't, or rather Joey has misunderstood me - he probably knows every > piece of code by heart. Hardly, and obviously not. I'd forgotten about the seen flag cache used in making it easier to do scripts that back up. Besides, it's 30kloc.. ;-) > Seen (after seeing in fact):

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Frank Küster wrote: > >> - If I set a debconf question's seen flag to "false" with db_fset, it >> will still be set to "true" again if the question is then asked to the >> user - no need to revert manually? I would be very surprised if this >> wasn't

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Frank Küster wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex >> Configuration database "frankdb" was not initialized. >> >> Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so >> that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence o

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Frank Küster wrote: > >> - If I set a debconf question's seen flag to "false" with db_fset, it >> will still be set to "true" again if the question is then asked to the >> user - no need to revert manually? I would be very surprised if this >> wasn't

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-12 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Frank Küster wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex >> Configuration database "frankdb" was not initialized. >> >> Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so >> that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence o

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-11 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex > Configuration database "frankdb" was not initialized. > > Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so > that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence of "init" in > debconf(7), debconf-devel(7) or d

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-11 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex > Configuration database "frankdb" was not initialized. > > Probably it would be better if you point me to some documentation so > that I don't have to bother the list. There no occurence of "init" in > debconf(7), debconf-devel(7) or d

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-11 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [some debconf answers] thank you. > Debconf does not understand ~ for home in .debconfrc. Try using > environment variable expansions: ${HOME} Oh, thank you. ~ is a sh thing, of course. However, now it says [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex Configura

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-11 Thread Frank Küster
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [some debconf answers] thank you. > Debconf does not understand ~ for home in .debconfrc. Try using > environment variable expansions: ${HOME} Oh, thank you. ~ is a sh thing, of course. However, now it says [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ debconf-show tetex Configura

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-10 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > - If a debconf question is manipulated by db_set, does that affect its > "seen" flag? And if it does, does it take effect immediately (i.e., > also for a following db_inut ...), or only in the next run of the > config file? No, you would have to use FSET to manipulate a

Re: Some debconf questions

2003-09-10 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Küster wrote: > - If a debconf question is manipulated by db_set, does that affect its > "seen" flag? And if it does, does it take effect immediately (i.e., > also for a following db_inut ...), or only in the next run of the > config file? No, you would have to use FSET to manipulate a

Some debconf questions

2003-09-10 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, I read again through debconf's manpages, but couldn't find answers to my questions. You can prepend a "Where can I find documenation about" to every question, if you like: - If a debconf question is manipulated by db_set, does that affect its "seen" flag? And if it does, does it take effect

Some debconf questions

2003-09-10 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, I read again through debconf's manpages, but couldn't find answers to my questions. You can prepend a "Where can I find documenation about" to every question, if you like: - If a debconf question is manipulated by db_set, does that affect its "seen" flag? And if it does, does it take effect