My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
I'm repackaging wine, as the old package is rather out of date. The old
package was also needlessly split into multiple packages, and
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
Not that haven't already been reported, afaics.
This doesn't make any sense, since
On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I
install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev first.
No, actually, Replaces: A says I contain files which A also
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I
install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev
Scott Ritchie wrote:
The second is that, although apt is removing libwine-dev, it is not
replacing it with wine-dev.
As other posters pointed out, wine-dev will not be installed
automatically (even though it Replaces: libwine-dev). You can ask to
install it manually.
If you want wine-dev to
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 10:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
Not that haven't
My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
I'm repackaging wine, as the old package is rather out of date. The old
package was also needlessly split into multiple packages, and
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
Not that haven't already been reported, afaics.
This doesn't make any sense, since
On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I
install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev first.
No, actually, Replaces: A says I contain files which A also
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 20041130T103405+, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say if I
install wine-dev, then remove libwine-dev
Scott Ritchie wrote:
The second is that, although apt is removing libwine-dev, it is not
replacing it with wine-dev.
As other posters pointed out, wine-dev will not be installed
automatically (even though it Replaces: libwine-dev). You can ask to
install it manually.
If you want wine-dev to
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 10:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
least one.
Not that haven't
12 matches
Mail list logo