Re: Unused libraries copyrigths

2008-01-21 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> No - unless the code in question has a non-free or non-GPL compatible > licence. Thats way to broad a statement. Its pretty fine to have GPL incompatible licenses. -- bye Joerg (13:24) ist iptables eigentlich nur ein tool zum verhindern von aussenkonnecti,erungen auf gewissen ports o

Re: Unused libraries copyrigths

2008-01-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 21/01/2008, Al Nikolov wrote: > In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries > which are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should > be done? > > 2b. All copyrights should be declared though the third party code is > not used in binary package (just becau

Re: Unused libraries copyrigths

2008-01-21 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:22 +0300 Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, mentors! > > In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which > are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done? Whether the source is compiled or not, it is distrib

Re: Unused libraries copyrigths

2008-01-21 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/1/21, Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, mentors! > > In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which > are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done? > > 1. Third party code should be stripped off from orig.tar in source package. > > or

Unused libraries copyrigths

2008-01-21 Thread Al Nikolov
Hello, mentors! In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done? 1. Third party code should be stripped off from orig.tar in source package. or 2a. It still there, but nothing about it's copyright s