> No - unless the code in question has a non-free or non-GPL compatible
> licence.
Thats way to broad a statement. Its pretty fine to have GPL incompatible
licenses.
--
bye Joerg
(13:24) ist iptables eigentlich nur ein tool zum
verhindern von aussenkonnecti,erungen auf gewissen ports o
On 21/01/2008, Al Nikolov wrote:
> In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries
> which are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should
> be done?
>
> 2b. All copyrights should be declared though the third party code is
> not used in binary package (just becau
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:22 +0300
Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, mentors!
>
> In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which
> are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done?
Whether the source is compiled or not, it is distrib
2008/1/21, Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello, mentors!
>
> In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which
> are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done?
>
> 1. Third party code should be stripped off from orig.tar in source package.
>
> or
Hello, mentors!
In a case when upstream tarball contains some third party libraries which
are not used in favor to theirs packaged versions, what should be done?
1. Third party code should be stripped off from orig.tar in source package.
or
2a. It still there, but nothing about it's copyright s
5 matches
Mail list logo