Hello,
since yesterday I am Debian Maintainer, but now I have a question:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
In http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer [1] is said, that I should
add a new line in debian/control file with: DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
and upload the
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the quality of uploads of package X by
maintainer
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the quality of uploads of
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:00, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
No, the correct process would be:
1. prepare a package
2. upload it to mentors.d.n
3. find a sponsor
4. reiterate 1-3 for some times then ask the sponsor to add the DM
flag. This should be done by the sponsor since he trusts you can
manage that package
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:19, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
No, the correct process would be:
1. prepare a package
2. upload it to mentors.d.n
3. find a sponsor
4. reiterate 1-3 for some times then ask the sponsor to add the DM
flag. This
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:19, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Then the DMUA line inside the package is the older way and no more
recommended for an Debian Maintainer?
Sorry for this misunderstanding question.
mh? As Paul said, and I
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:12:29AM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are
I demand that Sandro Tosi may or may not have written...
[snip]
the DMUA flag should be set by the sponsor (or by the sponsoree after a
request for the sponsor),
At the request of the sponsor, surely.
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
|
On 21.03.2010 00:20, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Sandro Tosi may or may not have written...
[snip]
the DMUA flag should be set by the sponsor (or by the sponsoree after a
request for the sponsor),
At the request of the sponsor, surely.
I think this is realy [tm] from sponsor to
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:00, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
So I am right to do in this way?
1. Set the DMUA first time inside the package (debian/control)
2. upload to mentors.d.o
3. ask for (last) sponsoring (RFS)
As I'm sure is
Le Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:03:31PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Hi Joachim and all,
just for the record, in the Debian Med packaging team, we add the
DM-Upload-Allowed: yes field to all our packages, and regulate DM upload
13 matches
Mail list logo
